Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation

Abstract

Habitat loss has pervasive and disruptive impacts on biodiversity in habitat remnants. The magnitude of the ecological impacts of habitat loss can be exacerbated by the spatial arrangement -or fragmentation -of remaining habitat. Fragmentation per se is a landscape-level phenomenon in which species that survive in habitat remnants are confronted with a modified environment of reduced area, increased isolation and novel ecological boundaries. The implications of this for individual organisms are many and varied, because species with differing life history strategies are differentially affected by habitat fragmentation. Here, we review the extensive literature on species responses to habitat fragmentation, and detail the numerous ways in which confounding factors have either masked the detection, or prevented the manifestation, of predicted fragmentation effects.Large numbers of empirical studies continue to document changes in species richness with decreasing habitat area, with positive, negative and no relationships regularly reported. The debate surrounding such widely contrasting results is beginning to be resolved by findings that the expected positive species-area relationship can be masked by matrix-derived spatial subsidies of resources to fragment-dwelling species and by the invasion of matrix-dwelling species into habitat edges. Significant advances have been made recently in our understanding of how species interactions are altered at habitat edges as a result of these changes. Interestingly, changes in biotic and abiotic parameters at edges also make ecological processes more variable than in habitat interiors. Individuals are more likely to encounter habitat edges in fragments with convoluted shapes, leading to increased turnover and variability in population size than in fragments that are compact in shape. Habitat isolation in both space and time disrupts species distribution patterns, with consequent effects on metapopulation dynamics and the genetic structure of fragment-dwelling populations. Again, the matrix habitat is a strong determinant of fragmentation effects within remnants because of its role in regulating dispersal and dispersalrelated mortality, the provision of spatial subsidies and the potential mediation of edge-related microclimatic gradients.We show that confounding factors can mask many fragmentation effects. For instance, there are multiple ways in which species traits like trophic level, dispersal ability and degree of habitat specialisation influence specieslevel responses. The temporal scale of investigation may have a strong influence on the results of a study, with short-term crowding effects eventually giving way to long-term extinction debts. Moreover, many fragmentation effects like changes in genetic, morphological or behavioural traits of species require time to appear. By contrast, synergistic interactions of fragmentation with climate change, human-altered disturbance regimes, species interactions and other drivers of population decline may magnify the impacts...

Critical Domain Problem for the Reaction–Telegraph Equation Model of Population Dynamics

“…Once population multiplication is taken into account, telegraph equation becomes the reaction-telegraph equation; see Equation (2). In case the per capita growth rate of the population can be regarded as density independent, i.e., F(u) = αu, Equation (2) takes the following form:…”

“…Understanding the factors affecting species survival in small and fragmented habitats is therefore a problem of high practical importance [2][3][4]. Although being essentially an ecological problem, it can hardly be studied in full by only traditional ecological methods and tools.…”

Conservation of the Ethiopian church forests: Threats, opportunities and implications for their management

“…Small fragments can indeed only support small populations, and small populations are susceptible to inbreeding and random genetic drift, resulting in poor adaptive potential to changing environmental conditions, reduced fitness and increased probabilities of extinction (Keller and Waller 2002). Increasing shape complexity and associated deleterious edge effects may further increase the vulnerability to local extinction, in particular for forest specialist species (Murcia 1995;Bender et al 1998;Ewers and Didham 2006). As habitat quality deteriorates through loss of woody plants in forest fragments, local extinctions of other taxa such as birds can be expected, for instance through loss of keystone species (Cordeiro et al 2015) or increased niche competition (Visco et al 2015).…”

Medium and large-sized mammals of the Reserva Ecológica de Guapiaçú, Cachoeiras de Macacu, RJ

“…The unrivalled numbers of endemic species and a relentless process of post-colonial deforestation (Dean 1996) make this forest an important region inside this Brazilian hotspot (Myers et al 2000). Actually, the forest cover only 19.6% of the state area (Fundaçã o SOS Mata Atlâ ntica & INPE 2011) in a fragmented distribution (Ribeiro et al 2009), contributing to biodiversity loss through the reduction of suitable areas to mammal persistence, especially for the larger species (Cardillo & Bromhan 2001, Kinnaird et al 2003, Ewers & Didham 2006. Besides that, fragmentation facilitates the access of hunters (Peres 2000), increasing the negative pressures over the populations of these animals (Chiarello 2000, Cullen et al 2001.…”