Confronting inequality in the “new normal”: Hyper‐capitalism, proto‐socialism, and post‐pandemic recovery

Abstract

Post‐pandemic recovery must address the systemic inequality that has been revealed by the coronavirus crisis. The roots of this inequality predate the pandemic and even the global financial crisis. They lie rather in the uneasy relationship between labor and capital under conditions of declining economic growth, such as those who have prevailed in advanced economies for almost half a century. This paper explores the dynamics of that relationship using a simple stock‐flow consistent (SFC) macroeconomic model of a closed economy. It examines in particular the role of two key factors—the savings rate and the substitutability (elasticity of substitution) between labor and capital—on the severity of systemic inequality under conditions of declining growth. The paper goes on to test the efficacy of three redistributive measures—a graduated income tax, a tax on capital and a universal basic income—under two distinct structural scenarios for an economy with a declining growth rate. We find that none of these measures is sufficient to control structural inequality when institutions aggressively favor capital over labor (hyper‐capitalism). Taken in combination, however, under conditions more favorable to wage labor (proto‐socialism), these same measures have the potential to eliminate inequality, almost entirely, even as the growth rate declines.

Is Innovation a Driver of Sustainability? An Analysis from a Spanish Region

“…If, from the macro point of view, we have stopped considering development as something linked only to production or economic activity, this paradigm shift will also be necessary at the company level. We should reflect on the aspects that should be taken into account to evaluate the success of a company beyond its generation of economic results [127]. While it is true that many companies currently carry out actions that have an impact on the population well-being, these measures must be compatible with good economic results, i.e., they must be transformed into revenue or cost reduction.…”

Digital Transformation and the New Normal in China: How Can Enterprises Use Digital Technologies to Respond to COVID-19?

“…The fight against the epidemic should make citizens return to normal life instead of to a "dehumanizing" new normal [5]. This new normal is unlikely to be a static equilibrium, because the pandemic shock has triggered another unexpected dynamic [6][7][8]. Social development and industrial development in both the manufacturing and service sectors, before COVID-19, could no longer effectively deal with structural inequalities (e.g., racial discrimination, unstable employment) brought about by COVID-19, and the spread of the epidemic should be effectively dealt with under the new normal [4,9,10].…”

“…Digital technologies play an important role in restarting the lives of citizens and improving their quality of life, post-pandemic. New digital technologies have been integrated into policy making, our social lives, and healthcare provision [4][5][6]. The preceding examples show that although the pandemic and lockdown restrictions have limited our offline lifestyles, the development of new digital technologies has helped us achieve an upgrade in our personal and professional lives after the pandemic.…”

«Relative decoupling» of the growth dilemma: retrospective assessment, trends and challenges

“…Несмотря на это, позиция Эрлиха не изменилась и сейчас: «риск постоянно возрастает, пока неуклонный экономический рост остается целью экономических и политических систем … постоянный рост -это кредо раковой клетки» (2018 г.) 1 .…”

“…настаивают, что все развитые страны, уже обеспечившие высокие стандарты качества жизни своего населения, должны отказаться от экономического роста вообще (такой подход называют «degrowth» или «нулевой рост»). Основополагающие тезисы второго подхода заключаются в том, что экономический рост неэкономичен и несправедлив, что он экологически неустойчив и что его никогда не будет достаточно [1][2][3]. Критикуя данную точку зрения, Р. Фюкс (Ralf Fuecks) пишет о тупиках нулевого роста: «с экологической точки зрения нулевой рост бессмыслен, с экономической и социально-политической -порождает массу сложностей: отток капитала, эмиграция активных граждан, снижение темпа инноваций, эрозия инфраструктуры, обострение и без того непростых проблем в системе пенсионного обеспечения и здравоохранения» [4, с.…”