2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.75.063514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confronting pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone-boson quintessence with data

Abstract: We analyze the observational constraints on the model where a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson (pNGB) plays the role of dark energy. The constraints are derived by using the latest Gold set of 182 type Ia supernovae and the CMB shift parameter. We allow for both the initial value of the scalar field and the present value of the energy density in the pNGB to vary. We find that -compared to previous analyses -the allowed portion of parameter space has shrunk around the region where the pNGB does not evolve significa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pseudo-Nambu Goldstone Boson (PNGB) -This model is motivated by the potential V (φ ∝ [1 + cos(φ/F )]) of the scalar field (Frieman et al 1995;Dutta & Sorbo 2007). The dark energy in this model is parameterized by its equation of state (Basilakos et al 2010)…”
Section: Cosmological Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudo-Nambu Goldstone Boson (PNGB) -This model is motivated by the potential V (φ ∝ [1 + cos(φ/F )]) of the scalar field (Frieman et al 1995;Dutta & Sorbo 2007). The dark energy in this model is parameterized by its equation of state (Basilakos et al 2010)…”
Section: Cosmological Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is one outstanding model-a cosmic axion or pseudo-Nambu Goldstone boson is arguably the only natural way to have an extremely low mass scalar (Frieman et al 1995), and keep it "dark" or non-interacting with the Standard Model (Carroll 1998). Here, the potential is V = m 4 (1 + cos φ/f ), where m 0.002 eV and f ∼ 10 18 GeV (Coble et al 1997;Dutta and Sorbo 2007). The field has been frozen by Hubble friction through most of cosmic history; it is currently relaxing to its ground state; in the future, the field will oscillate rapidly in the bottom of the potential, redshifting like nonrelativistic matter.…”
Section: Cosmological Parametersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We use these equations to obtain the evolution of the scalar field and Hubble parameter to constrain the model parameters. We will compare the latest observational constraints with the earlier work done in [16].…”
Section: Pngb Dark Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in Ref. [16] used 182 Gold SNe Ia data points [36] along with the CMB shift parameter constraint from WMAP 3-year data [37], whereas in this work we use 580 SNe data points from Union2.1 compilations [28], the CMB shift parameter from PLANCK data [29], and the baryon acoustic oscillation data from SDSS [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Constraining Standard Pngb Dark Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation