2019
DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2019.1659780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confronting Selection Bias: The Normative and Empirical Risks of Data Collection in Violent Contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only does this bring the validity of research findings into question, but when policy or practice is evidenced by research that has selection bias, the resulting impact may benefit specific groups over others and create harm overall. That is to say, selection bias may result in the design of public services for some at the expense of others (Bell-Martin and Marson, 2021). This can then result in exacerbating existing conflict triggers that may be based on inequality or grievance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not only does this bring the validity of research findings into question, but when policy or practice is evidenced by research that has selection bias, the resulting impact may benefit specific groups over others and create harm overall. That is to say, selection bias may result in the design of public services for some at the expense of others (Bell-Martin and Marson, 2021). This can then result in exacerbating existing conflict triggers that may be based on inequality or grievance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different groups may have a vested interest in controlling international perceptions of local realities. The lack of access can serve to further ‘marginalise the already marginalised’ (Bell-Martin and Marson, 2021). In order to overcome the issue of limited access, many external researchers rely on local actors, including the use of local facilitators and ‘fixers’, who negotiate access, arrange meetings and support foreign researchers and journalists.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of criminal governance poses salient methodological challenges. Working in lowinformation, dangerous areas renders investigators more susceptible to methodological missteps, in particular selection bias, that may undermine the validity of their findings (Bell-Martin & Marston, 2019;Koonings et al, 2019). Against this backdrop, the range, quality, and insight of findings rendered by this literature are simply remarkable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on criminal governance naturally raises important ethical questions. At least three sets of issues deserve attention, including (a) sensitive research vs. neutrality and power relations, (b) informed consent, and (c) confidentiality and protective issues (Bell-Martin & Marston, 2019). The way to address these issues is to develop a constant reflexivity in the research design that embeds situational ethics while having a broad toolkit of mechanisms before and after the fieldwork is done (Koonings et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where associations are either absent or ineffective, residents wishing to remain must seek out other means. Next, local associations may be corrupted by criminal groups (Abello-Colak & Guarneros-Meza, 2014) or exclude certain residents based on ethnicity, political leanings, or socio-economic status (Bell-Martin & Marston, 2019, p. 10). A resident threatened by the criminal group, then, would not be able to appeal to the local association, nor would excluded residents, all of whom would need an alternative means to remain in their homes.…”
Section: Alternative Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%