Confronting Suburbanization 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781118295861.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confronting Suburbanization in Ljubljana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were some exceptions; for example, in Slovenia suburbanization was most pronounced in the 1970s and 1980s. This was an effect of polycentric development processes, which were supported by the political elites in 1960s and set the path for accelerated suburbanization in Slovenia at that time (Uršič 2004;Uršič 2012;Pichler-Milanović 2014). In other Eastern Bloc countries, communist governments began to control internal migration via limits on the number of residential registration permits issued for cities as well as by constructing large new housing complexes on the outskirts of cities (Enyedi 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were some exceptions; for example, in Slovenia suburbanization was most pronounced in the 1970s and 1980s. This was an effect of polycentric development processes, which were supported by the political elites in 1960s and set the path for accelerated suburbanization in Slovenia at that time (Uršič 2004;Uršič 2012;Pichler-Milanović 2014). In other Eastern Bloc countries, communist governments began to control internal migration via limits on the number of residential registration permits issued for cities as well as by constructing large new housing complexes on the outskirts of cities (Enyedi 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result maps illustrate the gradual expansion of the built-up area in the surroundings of Bucharest, which allows an overview of the structural changes that have occurred after the turn of the millennium. Previous research noted that, generally in CEE countries, the uncontrolled expansion of built-up areas was embraced as a positive measure, regardless of the long lasting detrimental effects [5,109]. Thus, such quantitative approaches based on Landsat datasets enable the understanding of the urban development pathway, the resulting spatial outcome and related challenges, which can then be used to improve policy making that might sustain better planning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large amount of greenfield land and its lower costs, as compared with the capital, are considered the main attractive factors for establishing new developments [111]. Moreover, the preferences for the open space adjacent to large cities is common in CEE countries [5,53,63], fostered by the interest of local authorities to increase their budget revenues [68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the countries of Western Europe, functional and spatial transformations of the suburban area began many decades ago, but in the Central and Eastern part, these processes began much later and are related to the systemic transformation [1]. However, it seems that at present, trends are similar all over Europe, and suburban areas are subject to intensive spatial transformations [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], strong economic pressure [11][12][13][14] and landscape [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The areas near metropolitan centres, where migrations exert strong pressure, are the most transformed in Europe [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%