Confronting the European Portuguese central vowel distinction

Spahr, Christopher

doi:10.1017/cnj.2016.9

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…9 Absolute neutralization has been a contentious issue in phonological theory; see, e.g., Hyman (1970), Brame (1972), Kiparsky (1982b), Hall (2011a), and Yu (2011) However, Spahr (2016) argues that there is no underlying phonemic contrast between these two vowels; rather, the surface difference between (6a) and (6b) is derived from a morphological contrast in the presence or absence of a perfect suffix consisting of an empty V slot, as in (7). In (7b), the theme vowel /a/ at the end of the verb stem spreads to fill this empty position.…”

Section: What Counts As Contrastive and Wherementioning

confidence: 99%

Marginal contrasts and the Contrastivist Hypothesis

Hall

2016

Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Contrastivist Hypothesis (CH;Hall 2007;Dresher 2009) holds that the only features that can be phonologically active in any language are those that serve to distinguish phonemes, which presupposes that phonemic status is categorical. Many researchers, however, demonstrate the existence of gradient relations. For instance, Hall (2009) quantifies these using the informationtheoretic measure of entropy (unpredictability of distribution) and shows that a pair of sounds may have an entropy between 0 (totally predictable) and 1 (totally unpredictable).We argue that the existence of such intermediate degrees of contrastiveness does not make the CH untenable, but rather offers insight into contrastive hierarchies. The existence of a continuum does not preclude categorical distinctions: a categorical line can be drawn between zero entropy (entirely predictable, and thus by the CH phonologically inactive) and non-zero entropy (at least partially contrastive, and thus potentially phonologically active). But this does not mean that intermediate degrees of surface contrastiveness are entirely irrelevant to the CH; rather, we argue, they can shed light on how deeply ingrained a phonemic distinction is in the phonological system. As an example, we provide a case study from Pulaar [ATR] harmony, which has previously been claimed to be problematic for the CH.

show abstract

Section: What Counts As Contrastive and Wherementioning

confidence: 99%

Marginal contrasts and the Contrastivist Hypothesis

Hall

2016

Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Confronting the European Portuguese central vowel distinction

Cited by 1 publication

References 5 publications

Marginal contrasts and the Contrastivist Hypothesis

Marginal contrasts and the Contrastivist Hypothesis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About