Confronting the Geopolitical Aesthetic: Fredric Jameson,The Perfumed Nightmareand the Perilous Place of Third Cinema

Abstract

This essay explores the conceptual limitations within FredricJameson's notion of the geopolitical aesthetic through an analysis of Jameson's now classic reading of The Perfumed Nightmare; this film is central to his concept of the utopic character of film more generally and, moreover, to his argument on the embeddedness of Third World representations within a global, capitalist system. We suggest that, although Jameson acknowledges the underlying constructed and relational character of ontological categories such as film (despite their reification under capitalism), his theory of historical materialism demands that they also be understood as formed with regard to a socio-economic totality. And, because the recognition of a totality requires a master narrative within which all can be understood and framed within a logic of equivalence, Jameson must by default conceive of epistemology as fundamentally divided between a true and a false consciousness. Taking our own cue from recent developments in anti-essentialist thought, we conceive of such cultural forms as the temporarily fixed embodiment of broader-scale discourses that continually construct and deconstruct the world as we know it, including our understandings of the 'real' as well as the 'economic', the 'political' and the 'cultural'. In our own re-imagining of The Perfumed Nightmare, we provide a partial response to this, noting how these realms are constituted from the temporary 'fixing' of a series of people-and place-based identities, such as those constituted under the rubric

Beyond Representation: Film as a Pedagogical Tool in Urban Geography

“…However, this is suggested in a multimedia classroom in particular, as the appeal and acceptance of film by students, and society in general, can create the feeling that we're just watching movies in class. For geographers using film as an educational tool, this means that students must be encouraged to look beyond films as representations of reality, because there is not a single, true, reality to be filmed (Aitken and Zonn 1994;Hanna 1996;Creswell and Dixon 2002;Dixon and Grimes 2004;Dixon and Zonn 2005). The camera may capture form and movement, but what is on the image and the image itself are given meaning by society.…”

Global Trauma and the Cinematic Network Society

“…Second, ideological and allegorical analyses can treat films as ''spectacles'' that achieve two fundamental tasks: they explore public fears and fantasies of annihilation (Dixon, 2003); and they ''soothe'' these fears and pacify viewers (Kellner, 1982(Kellner, , 2003(Kellner, , 2005Lowenstein, 2005). These approaches produce compelling results, and my analysis maintains space for cinema's allegorical significance, even though it attempts to avoid many culture-as-spectacle or ''national allegory'' conclusions (Dixon and Zonn, 2005). Third, given these films' concerns with networks, affect, discipline, and ideal citizenship, Foucault's (1972Foucault's ( , 1977 hermeneutic methods provide more than a refuge from the psychoanalytic and Marxist methodologies; in fact, Foucault ideally enables an investigation of how semantic networks of power operate amid and constitute disciplinary and affective apparatuses, or dispositifs, defined as ''expressive combinatory machines which make words, things, and subjectivities intelligible'' (Cote, 2007, pp.…”

Projections of race, nature, and ethnographic childhood in early educational cinema at the national museum of canada

“…Gerald macdonald's (1994) review of the relation between third cinema, a critical anticolonial film movement beginning in the 1960s, and the geography of the third World is insightful, and his anticolonial disposition resonates with some of our theoretical concerns. However, third cinema represents an effort to subvert conventional Hollywood narratives and destabilize dominant cultural forms (macdonald 1994;dixon and Zonn 2005), and reflects a distinct mode of expression from the documentary/scientific mode of ethnographic cinema we aim to critique. laurel Smith's (2002) fascinating research on robert flaherty's 1922 film, Nanook of the North, remains unique in its focus on ethnographic cinema.…”