2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confronting the models of 3:2 quasiperiodic oscillations with the rapid spin of the microquasar GRS 1915+105

Abstract: Spectral fitting of the spin a ≡ cJ/GM 2 in the microquasar GRS 1915+105 estimate values higher than a = 0.98. However, there are certain doubts about this (nearly) extremal number. Confirming a high value of a > 0.9 would have significant concequences for the theory of high-frequency quasiperiodic oscillations (HF QPOs). Here we discuss its possible implications assuming several commonly used orbital models of 3:2 HF QPOs. We show that the estimate of a > 0.9 is almost inconsistent with two hot-spot (relativi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
117
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the above result is justified, except when very large non-geodesic corrections are taken into account. Only the RP1 model can survive with corrections of |∆ν| up to ∼ 20%, but the present physical interpretation of this model is unclear (see Török et al, 2011 for references). Török et al (2005) pointed out that since the 3 : 2 QPO frequencies in microquasars scale roughly as ν U .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the above result is justified, except when very large non-geodesic corrections are taken into account. Only the RP1 model can survive with corrections of |∆ν| up to ∼ 20%, but the present physical interpretation of this model is unclear (see Török et al, 2011 for references). Török et al (2005) pointed out that since the 3 : 2 QPO frequencies in microquasars scale roughly as ν U .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Analysis including the influence of non-geodesic effects would require a very detailed study. A rough estimate of their possible relevance can be done assuming the relative non-geodesic correction ∆ν (Török et al, 2011), which is needed to match the observations of GRS 1915+105 with a given model for a certain spin. For a ∈ (0.9, 1) and the RP model, it changes from −40% to −60%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In such situations, the ratio of the triples of the resonant frequencies is directly related to the black hole spin, independently of the black hole mass. The related possibility of directly measuring the black hole spin is very important because of relatively high uncertainties in observational estimates of the black hole mass that are necessary for determining the black hole spin in general resonant phenomena (Török et al , 2011, or in black hole spin determinations based on the measurements of profiled spectral lines (Laor 1991;Karas et al 1992;Dovčiak et al 2004;Fabian & Miniutti 2005;Zakharov 2003;Zakharov & Repin 2006;Zakharov et al 2012;Fanton et al 1997;Čadež et al 2003;Čadež & Calvani 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%