2006
DOI: 10.1525/si.2006.29.3.307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confronting "Victim" Discourses: The Identity Work of Battered Women

Abstract: In this article I explore how battered women both draw from and reject victim discourses in their processes of self-construction and self-representation. Data gathered from semistructured interviews with forty women who experienced violence from an intimate partner in a heterosexual relationship demonstrate that available "victim" discourses are both enabling and constraining. Four common representations of a victim emerged as most influential to women's identity work: as someone who suffers a harm she cannot … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
106
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
106
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In my data, explicit blaming the victim in this way was quite rare, and recent studies on the topic indicate that this attitude is gradually vanishing from public discourse as well (Leisenring, 2006). However, it seems that the notion that the victim is responsible for solving the problem lingers on.…”
Section: Victim's Responsibility For Solving the Problemmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In my data, explicit blaming the victim in this way was quite rare, and recent studies on the topic indicate that this attitude is gradually vanishing from public discourse as well (Leisenring, 2006). However, it seems that the notion that the victim is responsible for solving the problem lingers on.…”
Section: Victim's Responsibility For Solving the Problemmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…147-163) who signify their clients' worthiness for help. Their displays of sympathy serve as evidence that their clients' victimization is "no fault of [their] own" (Loseke 2000, p. 48) and that-despite their "difficult" behavior-they are "innocent and therefore blameless" (Dunn 2001, p. 288; see also Leisenring 2006). Clients who cannot adhere to the behavioral expectations for victims (Best 1997;Dunn and Powell-Williams 2007) not only threaten their access to sympathy (and services) in DV and SA agencies (Loseke 1992), they also risk having their claims denied in the criminal justice system (Dietz and Martin 2007;Dunn 2001).…”
Section: Intersection Of Emotion and Identity Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAFE staff members still believed they were willing to excuse their clients' breaches of feeling-rules more than outsiders. As Dunn (2001) and Leisenring (2006) have found, victims often express emotions that run counter to an "ideal" version of victimhood. The advocates and counselors understood this and took it into account when evaluating their clients' emotional displays.…”
Section: Identifying Clients' Inappropriate Emotional Displaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It oriented towards the Martyr-Target-Victim trope (Rofes, 2004) in order that this could be reworked into something more positive (see also Leisenring, 2006). Thus, although Daniel did talk about discrimination obliquely ('But I'm not denying that it would be easier'), he downgraded his experience into something relatively minor that should not be taken too seriously ('I'm not saying get the violins out').…”
Section: Author: No Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the run up to Extract 6, Ollie had built a 'survivor discourse' (Leisenring, 2006) that was predicated on his authenticity, determination, and personal growth.…”
Section: Identity and The Social Construction Of Discrimination 21mentioning
confidence: 99%