1992
DOI: 10.1179/073776992805307539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confucius and Capitalism: Views of Confucianism in Works on Confucianism and Economic Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are rather interested in Weber's conception of Protestant Culture as a set of ascetic and elitist assumptions that put pleasure and ethics in opposite corners of a contentious ring, as a foundational axiom of productive modernity. Weber was aware of the risk of oversimplification he was facing by choosing to venture into comparative cultural explanations of socio-economic development [152]. His ultimate goal was to upset the materialist determinism that stifled scholarship at the turn of the 20th century, prying open that determinism with a comparative history of religions as causal factors of social development.…”
Section: Parting Waysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are rather interested in Weber's conception of Protestant Culture as a set of ascetic and elitist assumptions that put pleasure and ethics in opposite corners of a contentious ring, as a foundational axiom of productive modernity. Weber was aware of the risk of oversimplification he was facing by choosing to venture into comparative cultural explanations of socio-economic development [152]. His ultimate goal was to upset the materialist determinism that stifled scholarship at the turn of the 20th century, prying open that determinism with a comparative history of religions as causal factors of social development.…”
Section: Parting Waysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a unique cultural factor based on Confucianism also made a comparable pattern of economic development in South Korea and Taiwan where the government played a bigger role in implementing the industrial policy based on the export-oriented industrialization than the private sectors because social relationship built on Confucianistic ideology is more likely to be vertical than horizontal in that the government is powerful enough to dominate other sectors in a society (Hahm & Paik, 2003;Jochim, 2013). In the process of implementing a new industrial policy with the promotion of the HCIs in South Korea and Taiwan, thus, various structural conditions in South Korea and Taiwan, such as strong Confucianistic cultural traits, strong leadership style of key policy makers, and consistent threat from the neighboring communist regimes, made the pattern of economic development based on the considerable government intervention (Amsden, 1989;Koo, 1987;Sakong, 1993) that was characterized as a developmental state in that the government has more independent or autonomous power, as well as controlling power over the private market behavior (Onis, 1991;Johnson, 1982;Evans, 1995).…”
Section: The Economic Development In South Korea and Taiwan In The 70mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional Chinese values originated from Confucian cultural ethos (Jochim 1992;Yao 2000), which is a collectivist-based value system that emphasizes and glorifies collective interests over individual rights (Guo 2012). In China, which has long been a collectivist society (Fiske 2002), consumers are "we" oriented, their "self" identity is primarily an interdependent self that is based on the social system (Lu 2001) in which family interests are placed above those of individuals within it (Wu and Tseng 1985).…”
Section: Persistent Traditional Chinese Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%