Confucius Institutes and the limitations of China’s global cultural network

Abstract

The majority of Anglophone literature tends to portray Confucius Institutes as playing a successful role serving China’s interests in its foreign collaborations. So far, the threat of this institution has been largely stereotyped and even taken for granted. Few scholars question the influence and capacity of the institution on both global and local scales. Relying on cartograms, correlation and national image analyses as well as qualitative studies, this article examines the influence of Confucius Institutes as the institution globalized and localized. This article reports three main findings: (1) the geopolitical influence of Confucius Institutes is uneven in different regions and they are engaged in an ongoing process of geopolitical construction; (2) analyses of correlation with China’s national image show that not only does the influence of the institution vary in regions but also that the project could have a negative impact on bilateral cooperation, suggesting that, contrary to popular thinking, Confucius Institutes have not had a positive impact on China’s global interests; and (3) the capacity of the institutes in everyday operations is systematically limited, reflecting China’s inexperience in managing this global cultural network. Confucius Institutes are generous in making economic concessions but are hesitant during political negotiations, which can be said to mirror China’s patchy performance in economic and political reform.

A Foucauldian Power Analysis of China’s Confucius Institute in Africa: Power, Knowledge and the Institutionalisation of China’s Foreign Policy

“…Therefore, the power structure of individual African CIs is commanded and supervised by the Chinese component of the partnership. This seems to be different from the CIs in some western countries where the Chinese directors felt powerless and passive (Yuan et al, 2016).…”

China’s Foreign Policy Shift in South Asia vis-à-vis Belt and Road Initiative

“…In South Asia, China has been actively promoting its culture and language through the establishment of Confucius Institutes in several countries. Here is a brief overview of the growth of Confucius Institutes in South Asia: (Yuan, Guo & Zhu, 2016).…”

China’s Confucius Institute and its European counterparts in Africa: A six-dimensional comparative study

“…Instead, the CI has attracted a great deal of suspicion, concern and criticism in some Western countries (King, 2017), which have even led to a wave of CI closures, 3 especially in the US where the number of CIs has plummeted from more than 100 to less than 20 since 2017. Therefore, a good deal of existing literature on the CI argues that it is a failing soft power tool, or an ineffective and unattractive foreign policy initiative that cannot easily promote China's soft power overseas (Lo and Pan, 2016;Zhou and Luk, 2016;Yuan et al, 2016;Hartig, 2019).…”