2015
DOI: 10.1201/b18733-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confusion Reigns? A Review of Marine Megafauna Interactions with Tidal-Stream Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
121
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 245 publications
1
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Associations between foraging seabirds and predictable physical conditions typically concern prey characteristics, with particular hydrodynamic (Benjamins et al, 2015;Hunt et al, 1999) or seabed features (Watanuki et al, 2008) being characterized by dense and exploitable aggregations of prey items. It also seems possible that the longer and deeper dives associated with the exploitation of prey on the seabed (Elliott et al, 2009) could result with benthic foraging species showing additional associations with physical conditions suspected to influence the performance of dives (Butler and Jones, 1997;Heath and Gilchrist, 2010).…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Associations between foraging seabirds and predictable physical conditions typically concern prey characteristics, with particular hydrodynamic (Benjamins et al, 2015;Hunt et al, 1999) or seabed features (Watanuki et al, 2008) being characterized by dense and exploitable aggregations of prey items. It also seems possible that the longer and deeper dives associated with the exploitation of prey on the seabed (Elliott et al, 2009) could result with benthic foraging species showing additional associations with physical conditions suspected to influence the performance of dives (Butler and Jones, 1997;Heath and Gilchrist, 2010).…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensive studies focussing upon areas of high horizontal current speeds are essential for this understanding, as foraging behaviours observed within these areas are likely to be very different to those within more benign areas. These differences in behaviour are likely to be driven by the unique physical characteristics of the former (Benjamins et al, 2015). However, few studies have investigated a species foraging behaviours within very specific areas (< 1 km 2 ) (Heithaus, 2005;Watanuki et al, 2008), and none have focussed on areas of high horizontal current speeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many tidal rapid areas are thought to be important areas for foraging (Pierpoint, 2008;Benjamins et al, 2015). During foraging harbour porpoises click rates increase and in the final phase of prey capture reach $600 clicks per second [an inter click interval (ICI) of 1.67 ms] (Verfuß et al, 2009) (2) Two or more individuals vocalising at the same time.…”
Section: Click Match Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the industry expands, the large scale deployment of tidal turbines and resulting inevitable increase in anthropogenic activity could also displace such animals (Frid et al, 2012). Little information exists on the interactions between tidal rapid areas and marine megafauna and thus the potential consequences of such habitat exclusion are not known (indeed a recent comprehensive review is titled "Confusion Reigns"; Benjamins et al, 2015). Of the multiple information gaps which exist in this area, the fine scale underwater movements and depth distributions of marine megafauna is perhaps least understood, yet forms a key parameter in assessing both collision risk (Thompson and Lonergan, 2015) and habitat usage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%