2004
DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.46.247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital absence of the permanent canines: a clinico-statistical study

Abstract: Abstract:We report here a clinico-statistical study of congenital absence of the permanent canines (CAPC). Sixty-five cases (22 men and 43 women) of CAPC were found in the files of 35,927 outpatients, an incidence of 0.18%. Thirty-seven cases had single absence of the canine and 28 cases had multiple absences. There were 42 cases in the maxilla, 17 in the mandible, and 6 in both the maxilla and the mandible. In the single absence cases, there was a tendency of occurrence at the left side in the maxilla, and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
28
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
28
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The most frequently affected teeth are the mandibular second premolar and the maxillary lateral incisor [4]. The congenital absence of canines in the permanent dentition is reportedly a very rare occurrence with prevalence rates varying from 0.06% to 0.18% [11]. The present cases report familial non-syndromic hypodontia in three siblings, of which two cases show bilateral maxillary canine agenesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The most frequently affected teeth are the mandibular second premolar and the maxillary lateral incisor [4]. The congenital absence of canines in the permanent dentition is reportedly a very rare occurrence with prevalence rates varying from 0.06% to 0.18% [11]. The present cases report familial non-syndromic hypodontia in three siblings, of which two cases show bilateral maxillary canine agenesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…[8] Fukuta et al in their study showed that male to female ratio affected by congenital absence of permanent canine was 1:2, with left side of maxilla and in the mandible right side being affected more. [7] The association of dental agenesis with syndromes and dental anomalies have also been reported in literature. These include Rieger syndrome, Witkop syndrome, Book syndrome, Down syndrome, oral and facial clefts, hemifacial microsomia and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] The incidence of congenitally missing permanent canine was found to be 0.1% in the maxilla and 0.02% of mandible in a survey of congenitally missing teeth, excluding third molar in 6000 orthodontic patients by Rose. [8] Fukuta et al in their study showed that male to female ratio affected by congenital absence of permanent canine was 1:2, with left side of maxilla and in the mandible right side being affected more.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Congenital absence of the canines in the permanent dentition is very rare and the reported incidence varies from 0.18 -0.45% (3,4,5). Studies have reported more predilections in females and in the maxilla (3,4). Dental anomalies associated with congenitally missing permanent canines include agenesis of other teeth, microdontia, malocclusion, and retained primary teeth (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prevalence of hypodontia in the permanent dentition (excluding 3rd molars) is about 4.5 -7.4% in Caucasians (1) and the most frequently affected teeth are the mandibular second premolar (3.4%) and the maxillary lateral incisor (2.2%) (2). Congenital absence of the canines in the permanent dentition is very rare and the reported incidence varies from 0.18 -0.45% (3,4,5). Studies have reported more predilections in females and in the maxilla (3,4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%