“…Dependent on the type of vessels and the extent of the mal formation involved, increase as well as decrease in the dependent tissue is therefore possible [3,6], In some cases a multifactorial inheritance has been suggested as an addi tional etiologic factor [23], A prerequisite for the management and prognostic judgement of vascular malformations is a clinically appli cable nomenclature and classification. In the past, an array of descriptive terms and incorrectly combined eponyms such as Klippel-Trenaunay-Parkes-Weber syndrome have been created [1,5,24], Several comprehensive proposals of classifications have been made [25][26][27], but they have all been subject to controversy and were not generally ac cepted. Because there is insufficient knowledge to classify vascular malformations based on etiology or pathogenesis alone, the best basis is to categorize them according to the primary vascular defect [2], Criteria such as the type of blood vessel involved, the presence of a truncular or an extratruncular angiodysplasia and high or low blood flow velocity, supplemented by the secondary disorders such as the ectatic veins and the associated tissue and bone changes have been the basis for the Hamburg classification 1988 (table 2) [28].…”