2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital Cartilaginous Rests of the Neck (Wattles)

Abstract: Wattles must be excised, including their cartilaginous core, after having sonographically excluded fistulae or sinuses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar structures were also occasionally reported in other species such as sheep, pigs and humans (Darwin ; Mouquet ; Fröhner ; Lush ; Schumann ; Weissengruber ; Coras et al . ; Nasser et al . ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar structures were also occasionally reported in other species such as sheep, pigs and humans (Darwin ; Mouquet ; Fröhner ; Lush ; Schumann ; Weissengruber ; Coras et al . ; Nasser et al . ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wattles were alternatively designated as appendices colli, cervical chondrocutaneous remnants or congenital cartilaginous rest of neck (Weissengruber ; Coras et al . ; Nasser et al . ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These malformations include microtia, stenosis of the external ear canal, and branchiogenic fistulae. In addition Goldenhar, Treacher-Collins, Townes-Brocks, Wolf-Hischhorn and Delleman syndromes can be associated [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Diagnosis is confirmed by histological examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Shave excision is not recommended because it may leave the cartilage exposed and cause subsequent complications [7][8][9]. The lesion may be attached to underlying fascia by a fibrous band but can be easily excised since it is neither fistulous nor cystic [7][8][9]. Lesions that do not have fistulous tracts or connections with deeper structures can be carefully excised at the superficial musculature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These remnants have been suggested to mark unsuspected branchial sinus (Christensen and Barr, 1985; Coras et al, 2005). In none of the reviewed articles was there any evidence of sinuses or cysts associated with the cervical remnant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%