1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(89)80208-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital duodenal obstruction: The impact of an antenatal diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with two other series documenting postnatal diagnosis in 56% of cases of congenital duodenal obstruction. 10,11 Although these reports did not provide details of neonatal condition, one indicated that diagnosis occurred at a mean of 5.7 days of life; later diagnosis was associated with delayed surgery and longer hospital stay. 11 In our report, infants whose defect was diagnosed prenatally had earlier surgery than those diagnosed postnatally; however, there was no difference in length of hospitalization, probably because those diagnosed antenatally were less mature and more likely to have other birth defects compared with the postnatal diagnosis group.…”
Section: Congenital Duodenal Obstruction H Kilbride Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent with two other series documenting postnatal diagnosis in 56% of cases of congenital duodenal obstruction. 10,11 Although these reports did not provide details of neonatal condition, one indicated that diagnosis occurred at a mean of 5.7 days of life; later diagnosis was associated with delayed surgery and longer hospital stay. 11 In our report, infants whose defect was diagnosed prenatally had earlier surgery than those diagnosed postnatally; however, there was no difference in length of hospitalization, probably because those diagnosed antenatally were less mature and more likely to have other birth defects compared with the postnatal diagnosis group.…”
Section: Congenital Duodenal Obstruction H Kilbride Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duodenal obstruction (DO) is a congenital abnormality that occurs in around 1.3 per 10 000 live births1, 2; it is the most commonly detected small‐bowel obstruction during fetal life3. In approximately half of cases it is associated with other abnormalities, particularly cardiac, vertebral, renal and gastrointestinal ones such as anal atresia and tracheoesophageal atresia (non‐isolated DO)4, 5. DO is associated with trisomy 21 in 30% of cases5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydramnios is frequently found among these patients (77% in our series), but is missing in some cases because of a possible placental balancing, still unexplained [4,[10][11][12] . Prenatal recognition of incomplete CDO, either intrinsic or secondary to extrinsic compression, is rather unusual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for an infrequent earlier detection in utero of the typical double-bubble feature of CDO are still not clear; it is probably the result of an initial low-pressure gastric emptying which is not able to distend the proximal duodenum until later in gestation. Furthermore, foetal vomiting may decompress the stomach so that the double-bubble sign may be missed on a single scan [12] . There are obvious benefits from a PND of CDO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%