The importance of capturing the architecture of depositional facies within a system cannot be overemphasized. For a channel system as in most cases in the Niger Delta, the problem of accurately describing the geometry of these channels exists. Ideally, object based models are best suited to reproduce facies architecture, but this is generally hindered by the rigidity of this algorithm. Moreover, the application of outcrop analogue in the object model to reproduce the subsurface could be stalled by the differences in diagenesis between the outcrop and the reservoir. Thus, the need to modify the algorithm in modelling the system arises.
We adopted a robust object and pixel based model to capture the reservoir heterogeneity while honouring hard data. The approach includes integrating several available options for a particular channel setting in the software used (for the object based model) to come up with a flexible descriptor. Depositional trend were also built to capture the upward fining sequence of tidal channel sands. This was accomplished by building a complex transformation sequence to ensure accurate petrophysical description within the facies using a pixel model.
The result is a model that incorporates morphologic information and petrophysical trends from analogue while accurately describing the rock and fluid property using well data.
Introduction
The architecture of the Niger Delta channel sands results from an interplay of one or more of the various depositional energies (fluvial, wave and tides). These interactions and the abundant supply of fluvial sediments make the geometry of the channels complex. To reproduce the architecture and subsequently model the petrophysical setting is thus very challenging.
Over the past few years, a lot of work has been done in the modelling of channel systems, Schatzinger et al., 1999 emphasized the link between lateral cyclicity of petrophysical properties and the scale of primary bedding features, which can be transferred from outcrops directly into the subsurface because scaling problem are avoided. Hauge et al., 2003, showed how sandbody geometry can be modelled using object models. The studies by Knox et al., 1999 suggested that fluvial reservoirs deposited early in an intermediate frequency cycle contains several narrow laterally isolated channel belts, whereas adjacent reservoir deposited late in the cycle(as in our case) contains a single broad channel belt that is internally heterogeneous. The dimension of complex channel of deep water deposit (Beaubouef, 2004) and several analogue geometry documented by Robert, 2004 are used as guide in choosing the geometry. These distributions provide constraints for conditioning the area, shape, placement, and preferred orientations of sedimentary units in reservoir models.