2012
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2012.678797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital talipes equinovarus: an epidemiological study in Sicily

Abstract: Background and purposeCongenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot) can present in 2 forms: “syndromic”, in which other malformations exist, and the more common “idiopathic” form, where there are no other associated malformations. We analyzed the epidemiology of congenital talipes equinovarus in the Sicilian population, looking for potential etiological factors.Patients and methodsAmong the 801,324 live births recorded between January 1991 and December 2004, 827 cases were registered (560 males; M/F sex ratio: 2.1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(28 reference statements)
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of congenital clubfoot in our study was comparable with those observed in other European population‐based studies: 1.03 per 1,000 livebirths in Sicily (Pavone et al, ) and 1.1 per 1,000 livebirths in Norway (Dodwell, Risoe, & Wright, ). However, the recorded prevalence of congenital clubfoot in our study was lower compared to 1.4 per 1,000 livebirths for isolated congenital clubfoot found in a study in Sweden (Wallander, Hovelius, & Michaelsson, ), 1.8 per 1,000 livebirths for all congenital clubfoot cases and 1.1 per 1,000 births for isolated congenital clubfoot in a study in Southern Australia (Byron‐Scott et al, ), 1.14 per 1,000 livebirths for isolated congenital clubfoot in Iowa (Kancherla et al, ) and 1.29 per 1,000 livebirths pooling 10 birth defects surveillance programs in the US (Parker et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The prevalence of congenital clubfoot in our study was comparable with those observed in other European population‐based studies: 1.03 per 1,000 livebirths in Sicily (Pavone et al, ) and 1.1 per 1,000 livebirths in Norway (Dodwell, Risoe, & Wright, ). However, the recorded prevalence of congenital clubfoot in our study was lower compared to 1.4 per 1,000 livebirths for isolated congenital clubfoot found in a study in Sweden (Wallander, Hovelius, & Michaelsson, ), 1.8 per 1,000 livebirths for all congenital clubfoot cases and 1.1 per 1,000 births for isolated congenital clubfoot in a study in Southern Australia (Byron‐Scott et al, ), 1.14 per 1,000 livebirths for isolated congenital clubfoot in Iowa (Kancherla et al, ) and 1.29 per 1,000 livebirths pooling 10 birth defects surveillance programs in the US (Parker et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Orthopaedic conditions commonly present bilaterally [1,6,14,19]. In clinical trials, data from each limb are commonly treated as independent [10,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orthopaedic conditions, such as clubfoot often present bilaterally [1,4,6,14,19]. Orthopaedic research commonly involves analysis of populations of patients with bilateral presentations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemiologic studies have consistently reported higher prevalence of idiopathic clubfoot in males and firstborn but any associations with smoking, race/ ethnicity and maternal age are not clear (Cardy et al, 2007;Dickinson et al, 2008;Kancherla et al, 2010;Pavone et al, 2012). These studies are very scanty in Nigeria and to the best of our knowledge no study has focused on idiopathic clubfoot in our country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Some studies differ in opinion in that they found no association (Werler et al, 2013;Pavone et al, 2012;Carey et al, 2005;Skelly et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%