1986
DOI: 10.1097/00000478-198608000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital Testicular Juvenile Granulosa Cell Tumor in a Neonate with X/XY Mosaicism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
16
0
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the detection of cytokeratin subtypes 8 and 18 coincides with results on immunoblotting23 and those previously obtained with antibody CAM5p2 against cytokeratin subtypes 8, 18, and 1922 on ovarian granulosa cell tumours. According to our results, the reactivity is not due to cytokeratin subtype 19. The negativity for cytokeratin even after protein digestion of paraffin wax sections differs from the results reported by Benjamin et at22 and may be due to different epitopes which react with the antibodies KLI -and C uAM52 C -,g The main divergence from the results of Czernobilsky et al23 on ovarian granuloma cell tumours is the negativity for desmoplakin in our case, although the same antibody DP 1 & 2-Due, Dieckmann, Niedobitek, Bornhoft, Loy, Stein as paralleled by the variations in cytokeratin expressions on ovarian granulosa cell tumours,22 or whether this represents antigenic differences in testicular and ovarian granulosa cell tumours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Furthermore, the detection of cytokeratin subtypes 8 and 18 coincides with results on immunoblotting23 and those previously obtained with antibody CAM5p2 against cytokeratin subtypes 8, 18, and 1922 on ovarian granulosa cell tumours. According to our results, the reactivity is not due to cytokeratin subtype 19. The negativity for cytokeratin even after protein digestion of paraffin wax sections differs from the results reported by Benjamin et at22 and may be due to different epitopes which react with the antibodies KLI -and C uAM52 C -,g The main divergence from the results of Czernobilsky et al23 on ovarian granuloma cell tumours is the negativity for desmoplakin in our case, although the same antibody DP 1 & 2-Due, Dieckmann, Niedobitek, Bornhoft, Loy, Stein as paralleled by the variations in cytokeratin expressions on ovarian granulosa cell tumours,22 or whether this represents antigenic differences in testicular and ovarian granulosa cell tumours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In case 1, a small paraovarian cystic tumor proved to be a JGCT. Although rare, this neoplasm has been described in testicles of infants and children with abnormal sexual development [27][28][29] and in some patients with no apparent sexual abnormalities. 12 Histological analysis of the tumors in cases 2-4 revealed typical characteristics of gonadoblastoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When associated to external genitalia abnormalities, like ambiguous genitalia or hypospadia, JGCT usually presents abnormal karyotypes involving X/XY mosaicism or structural abnormalities of the chromosome Y 12 , 17 - 19. Chromosomal abnormality linked to the Y chromosome was reported to be found in 20% of the cases 18 , 19…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the method of dosage using Siemens kit accepts several interferences as causing false-positive results mainly in the range of 10–50 mUI/L. Therefore AFP and hCG determinations are considered useless tumor markers for this type of neoplasm 18 , 19. Imaging studies, mainly those obtained by ultrasound examination, show a complex cystic and solid mass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%