2020
DOI: 10.1002/uog.20845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): diagnostic criteria for T‐shaped uterus

Abstract: CONTRIBUTIONWhat are the novel findings of this work? The prevalence, clinical relevance and appropriateness of management of T-shaped uterus is not fully understood, due to the lack of objective criteria for its diagnosis. This study developed an objective definition of T-shaped uterus based on the diagnosis made most often by representative expert clinicians, surgeons and sonologists. We identified three uterine morphometric measurements in the coronal plane, with cut-offs (lateral internal indentation depth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current focus of societies of reproductive medicine and gynecological imaging should be on the creation of universally accepted criteria and a better international classification system than the existing options, based on truly objective and clinically relevant criteria. There is as yet no consensus regarding appropriate and objective criteria for classification of congenital anomalies, which would both facilitate patient management and limit unnecessary surgical procedures. There is a concerning possibility of unnecessary stigmatization of and surgery in healthy women with normal uterus, having been diagnosed with septate or dysmorphic uterus, associated in particular with development of the ESHRE/ESGE classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current focus of societies of reproductive medicine and gynecological imaging should be on the creation of universally accepted criteria and a better international classification system than the existing options, based on truly objective and clinically relevant criteria. There is as yet no consensus regarding appropriate and objective criteria for classification of congenital anomalies, which would both facilitate patient management and limit unnecessary surgical procedures. There is a concerning possibility of unnecessary stigmatization of and surgery in healthy women with normal uterus, having been diagnosed with septate or dysmorphic uterus, associated in particular with development of the ESHRE/ESGE classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…performed an updated analysis of the stored 3D ultrasound datasets for offline measurement of internal indentation angle, using the same type of machine (Voluson E8 Expert, with updated software (BT13)) as had been used for the real‐time evaluation in the primary study. The indentation angle was measured by tracing two lines close to the indentation apex.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is not recommended by any guidelines, there is a tendency to use operative hysteroscopy for the correction of uterine cavity shape in such debatable entities like arcuate, and T-shaped/dysmorphic uterus in infertile women. 58 Some authors perform correction of the normal uterus under the name of abnormal uterus according to confusing classification systems. 58 Interestingly, all these procedures are reported as beneficial in uncontrolled before/after studies in infertile women.…”
Section: Diagnostic Hysteroscopy and Operative Hysteroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58 Some authors perform correction of the normal uterus under the name of abnormal uterus according to confusing classification systems. 58 Interestingly, all these procedures are reported as beneficial in uncontrolled before/after studies in infertile women. Sometimes, endometrial scratching is performed by hysteroscopy.…”
Section: Diagnostic Hysteroscopy and Operative Hysteroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sterile plastic 5‐Fr balloon catheter was inserted into the cervical canal and inflated with 1.0 mL of saline. Three‐dimensional (3D) sonohysterography with automatic volume calculation (SonoHysteroAVC, GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria) showed a normal/arcuate uterus according to the Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME) criteria with a small uterine cavity < 1 mL in volume. During infusion of saline/air (10 mL of saline and 10 mL of air), the right tube was found to be patent but findings were inconclusive on the left side.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%