2009
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803733106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenitally altered motor experience alters somatotopic organization of human primary motor cortex

Abstract: Human motor development is thought to result from a complex interaction between genes and experience. The well-known somatotopic organization of the primate primary motor cortex (M1) emerges postnatally. Although adaptive changes in response to learning and use occur throughout life, somatotopy is maintained as reorganization is restricted to modifications within major body part representations. We report of a unique opportunity to evaluate the influence of experience on the genetically determined somatotopic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
58
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While we may have missed some TA representations on the medial wall, lateral convexity TA maps are never seen in an unaffected population. Lateralized foot motor map representations have, however, been found in adults with dysmelia (Stoeckel et al, 2009). In our current study, we were unable to identify TA motor maps in some children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we may have missed some TA representations on the medial wall, lateral convexity TA maps are never seen in an unaffected population. Lateralized foot motor map representations have, however, been found in adults with dysmelia (Stoeckel et al, 2009). In our current study, we were unable to identify TA motor maps in some children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested by Stoeckel et al [49] an altered motor experience during early motor development may play a more critical role in the shaping of genetically determined neural networks underlying control of movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing evidence suggests that the motor cortex of the IDs who do not report phantom sensations of the absent limbs does not contain a representation of the missing limbs Reilly & Sirigu, 2011;Stoeckel, Seitz & Buetefish, 2009). Rather, the specific parts of their somatosensory and motor cortices that would normally represent the "absent" limbs are allocated to the representation of adjacent body parts Stoeckel et al, 2005;Stoeckel et al, 2009). Therefore, if the influence of the body biomechanical constraints on the perceived path of apparent body movement relies on somatosensory and motor representations of the observer's own body, then, the perception of apparent upper limb movement should be biased toward biomechanically plausible movements in the controls but not in the IDs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%