2012
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2011.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congestion analysis in DEA inputs under weight restrictions

Abstract: Data envelopment analysis (DEA), which is used to determine the efficiency of a decision-making unit (DMU), is able to recognize the amount of input congestion. Moreover, the relative importance of inputs and outputs can be incorporated into DEA models by weight restrictions. These restrictions or a priori weights are introduced by the decision maker and lead to changes in models and efficiency interpretation. In this paper, we present an approach to determine the value of congestion in inputs under the weight… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others authors move on from classic DEA models, like [24] who identify and classify efficient DMU's by applying a two-stage DEA, and [27] develop a DEA model based around evaluating the effectiveness of PERT/CPM (critic path method) projects, and identifying points of reference between industries. Or [9] apply a DEA model with weight restrictions in their input variables.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others authors move on from classic DEA models, like [24] who identify and classify efficient DMU's by applying a two-stage DEA, and [27] develop a DEA model based around evaluating the effectiveness of PERT/CPM (critic path method) projects, and identifying points of reference between industries. Or [9] apply a DEA model with weight restrictions in their input variables.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investment 4 Lozano & Villa, 2005Park, 2007;Wong & Wong, 2007;Bao et al, 2008;Soleimani-damaneh, 2009;Alem et al, 2009;Dotoli et al, 2010;Barnum et al, 2010. Business 8 Saranga & Moser, 2010;Chen, 2010;. Marketing 3 Kang, 2010Samoilenko & Osei-Bryson, 2010;Milioni et al, 2011;Chen & Delmas, 2011;Kerstens & Woestyne, 2011;You & Yan, 2011;Zhou et al, 2011;Liu & Lu, 2012;Wang et al, 2012;Guedes et al, 2012;Akçay, 2012;Samoilenko, 2012;Samoilenko, 2012;Amindoust et al, 2012;Davoodi et al, 2012;Huang & Kao, 2012;Huang & Kao, 2012;Puri & Yadav, 2013; Organization 18 Braglia & Petroni, 2000;Triantis, 2004;Greasley, 2005;Sevkli et al, 2007;Chuang et al, 2009;Feng & Jiang, 2009;Xu et al, 2009;Bandyopadhyay, 2011. Product 8 Liu andWu, 2005;Seydel, 2006;Talluria et al, 2006;Ramanathan, 2007;Çelebi & Bayraktar, 2008;Zhao ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%