2020
DOI: 10.31979/mti.2020.1817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congestion-Clearing Payments to Passengers

Abstract: (Caltrans), and by private grants and donations. MTI's transportation policy work is centered on three primary responsibilities: MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE LEAD UNIVERSITY OF Mineta Consortium for Transportation Mobility Research MTI works to provide policy-oriented research for all levels of government and the p rivate sector to foster the development of optimum surface transportation systems. Research areas include: bicycle and pedestrian issues; financing public and private sector transportation improv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With two HOT lanes, not only would more new carpoolers need to be paid, but the payment per carpool would also increase, since payments will need to be attractive enough to new (i.e., "marginal") solo drivers who would not have been willing to shift when lower payments are offered, as in the case of one HOT lane when only half as much traffic reduction is needed. Minett et al (2020) also derived a regression equation which calculates the impact of a daily cash payment to incentivize commuters to ride as a passenger (see Figure 6). For example, the equation estimates that a cash incentive of $1.00 daily, or 50 cents per trip, would attract about 15% of commuters to ride as a passenger "if it is easy to ride as a passenger."…”
Section: Financial Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With two HOT lanes, not only would more new carpoolers need to be paid, but the payment per carpool would also increase, since payments will need to be attractive enough to new (i.e., "marginal") solo drivers who would not have been willing to shift when lower payments are offered, as in the case of one HOT lane when only half as much traffic reduction is needed. Minett et al (2020) also derived a regression equation which calculates the impact of a daily cash payment to incentivize commuters to ride as a passenger (see Figure 6). For example, the equation estimates that a cash incentive of $1.00 daily, or 50 cents per trip, would attract about 15% of commuters to ride as a passenger "if it is easy to ride as a passenger."…”
Section: Financial Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cash rewards have been used to encourage mode shifts since the 1990s ( 9 ). These include parking cash out ( 10 ), mode-shift incentives that have been used to reduce congestion in corridors for short periods of time ( 11 , 12 ), incentives to manage the level of demand for parking ( 13 ), and incentive payments to ridesharing passengers ( 14 ). However, most of these reward strategies have been applied at a local level rather than at the system level as envisioned in this paper.…”
Section: Background and Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“… Note : P3 = public-private partnership; VMT = vehicle miles traveled; na = not applicable. a Based on TRUCE model ( 21 ). b Average daily peak period traffic from Table 1 multiplied by 100 freeway miles. c Based on Reason Foundation ( 22 ). d Based on FHWA ( 23 ). e Annual trips calculated assuming an average freeway trip length of 10 mi and 250 working days per year. f Per trip cost based on rideshare program pilot in San Francisco ( 24 ) adjusted for economies of scale; and annual trips calculated assuming average trip length on freeway segment of 10 mi and 250 working days per year. g Subsidy required for 15% shift to ridesharing based on research by Minett et al ( 27 ). …”
Section: Model Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations