2018
DOI: 10.1080/00330124.2018.1443477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congressional Redistricting: Keeping Communities Together?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As work continues quantifying the degree to which communities are divided by district lines (e.g., Rossiter, Wong, and Delamater 2018), we offer the unnecessary overlapping of congressional and state House districts as a gerrymandering measure that is intuitive, easily accessed, widely applicable, durable, and complementary to well‐established measures of gerrymandering‐like compactness but with a distinct capacity to indicate the imposition of needless complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As work continues quantifying the degree to which communities are divided by district lines (e.g., Rossiter, Wong, and Delamater 2018), we offer the unnecessary overlapping of congressional and state House districts as a gerrymandering measure that is intuitive, easily accessed, widely applicable, durable, and complementary to well‐established measures of gerrymandering‐like compactness but with a distinct capacity to indicate the imposition of needless complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other quantitative methods for identifying communities of interest have been proposed in the literature. Most notably, Rossiter et al [91] generated communities of interest using Thessian polygons and, somewhat similarly to the approach discussed herein, geospatial clustering of block groups based on the minimum spanning tree method of R. M. AssunC ¸ão et al [11]. However, the approach discussed below takes a more graph-centric approach, allowing for characterizations of interest using novel data and scalability on tessellations, while also clustering based on graphical community structure.…”
Section: A Practical Motivation For Systematic Evidence Of Coismentioning
confidence: 99%