1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf02187910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congruence, similarity, and symmetries of geometric objects

Abstract: We consider the problem of computing geometric transformations (rotation, translation, reflexion) that map a point set A exactly or approximately into a point set B. We derive efficient algorithms for various cases (Euclidean or maximum metric, translation or rotation, or general congruence).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
194
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
194
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the formulations of the point matching problem in computational geometry are not suitable for noisy, cluttered images either because they require exact matches [12], they require 1-1 matches [13,14] or they assume that every point in one set has a close match in the other set in terms of the (standard) Hausdorff distance [15][16][17][18]. Even under these relatively restrictive assumptions, the computational complexity can be quite high.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the formulations of the point matching problem in computational geometry are not suitable for noisy, cluttered images either because they require exact matches [12], they require 1-1 matches [13,14] or they assume that every point in one set has a close match in the other set in terms of the (standard) Hausdorff distance [15][16][17][18]. Even under these relatively restrictive assumptions, the computational complexity can be quite high.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Condition (2). If the cardinality |C| of a cluster C is larger than 2k, the cluster is split using Lemma 4.1.…”
Section: Updating the Dynamic Partition And The Structure Of T T And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using just one phase of a static maximum cardinality matching algorithm per update leads to a dynamic algorithm with O(n + m) worst-case update time (see, e.g., [2]). This is still the best known algorithm.…”
Section: Maximum Cardinality Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In pattern recognition and computer vision literature, the problem of symmetry detection was studied mainly in images [15], two-dimensional [31,2,1] and three-dimensional shapes [27,10,17]. A wide spectrum of methods employed for this purpose includes approaches based on dual spaces [7], genetic algorithms [9], moments [5], pair matching [13,6], and local shape descriptors [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%