2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00013-018-1207-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congruences for coefficients of level 2 modular functions with poles at 0

Abstract: We give congruences modulo powers of p ∈ {3, 5, 7} for the Fourier coefficients of certain modular functions in level p with poles only at 0, answering a question posed by Andersen and the first author and continuing work done by the authors and Moss. The congruences involve a modulus that depends on the base p expansion of the modular form's order of vanishing at ∞.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using Lemma 2.4, the smallest exponent of q appearing in U α p (φ (p) ) m is f α (p) (m). Lemma 2.5 provides a connection between γ p (m, α) and the integers f α (p) (m): γ p is counting the number of 0s and 1s to the left of the first nonzero digit in the base p expansion of m. The key difference between the following lemma and its corresponding lemma in [7] is that there are more digits in bases 3, 5, 7.…”
Section: Lemma 22 ([3 Lemma 3])mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Using Lemma 2.4, the smallest exponent of q appearing in U α p (φ (p) ) m is f α (p) (m). Lemma 2.5 provides a connection between γ p (m, α) and the integers f α (p) (m): γ p is counting the number of 0s and 1s to the left of the first nonzero digit in the base p expansion of m. The key difference between the following lemma and its corresponding lemma in [7] is that there are more digits in bases 3, 5, 7.…”
Section: Lemma 22 ([3 Lemma 3])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implicitly, this proves the result by induction. This structure differs from [7] because it allows us to prove the polynomial step in a much cleaner way. Another approach to proving the base case can be found in [5,Lemma 4…”
Section: Chapter 3 Proof Of the Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations