“…These three samples’ high-resolution C 1s spectra (Figure b) exhibit four prominent peaks accordingly signifying CC, C–OH, C–O–C, and HO–CO bonds. Meanwhile, Figure b also shows that the Ru 3d and C 1s signals overlapped, and the fitted Ru 3d signal is divided into the Ru 3d 3/2 and Ru 3d 5/2 peaks for Ru SA/GFs (285.20 and 281.70 eV) and Ru NPs/GFs (285.10 and 281.60 eV), respectively. , In the O 1s spectra (Figure c), aside from the existence of O–H and C–O bonds in three of them, , the emergence of the peak around 530.20 eV corresponding to Ru–O appeared in both Ru SA/GFs and Ru NP/GFs, while the peak located about 533.33 eV attributed to HO–CO observed in GFs diminishes. This alteration suggests that the Ru species anchored on the GFs through chemical bonding. , Furthermore, the signal of Na in GFs is relatively strong, whereas the Na signal decreases after the deposition of Ru (Figure S3), suggesting that the Na element probably indeed exerts a pronounced influence on the formation of the Ru single atom …”