Urbanization, a dominant global demographic trend, leads to various changes in environments (e.g., atmospheric CO 2 increase, urban heat island). Cities experience global change decades ahead of other systems so that they are natural laboratories for studying responses of other nonurban biological ecosystems to future global change. However, the impacts of urbanization on vegetation growth are not well understood. Here, we developed a general conceptual framework for quantifying the impacts of urbanization on vegetation growth and applied it in 32 Chinese cities. Results indicated that vegetation growth, as surrogated by satellite-observed vegetation index, decreased along urban intensity across all cities. At the same time, vegetation growth was enhanced at 85% of the places along the intensity gradient, and the relative enhancement increased with urban intensity. This growth enhancement offset about 40% of direct loss of vegetation productivity caused by replacing productive vegetated surfaces with nonproductive impervious surfaces. In light of current and previous field studies, we conclude that vegetation growth enhancement is prevalent in urban settings. Urban environments do provide ideal natural laboratories to observe biological responses to environmental changes that are difficult to mimic in manipulative experiments. However, one should be careful in extrapolating the finding to nonurban environments because urban vegetation is usually intensively managed, and attribution of the responses to diverse driving forces will be challenging but must be pursued.rbanization, one of the most dramatic forms of land conversion, leads to various changes in atmospheric and climatic conditions (e.g., atmospheric CO 2 increase, urban heat island), vegetation community structure, species abundance and diversity, and biogeochemical cycles (1-4). Cities experiencing elevated temperature (i.e., urban "heat island" warming), CO 2 , and nitrogen deposition decades ahead of the projected average global change are regarded as the "harbingers" of the future global change (5, 6). It is for this reason that cities have been regarded as ideal natural laboratories for global change studies and particularly valuable to elucidate the potential responses of other nonurban ecosystems to future climate and environmental changes (2, 6, 7).It has long and widely been believed, particularly in the horticultural and landscaping communities, that trees grow slower in cities than in rural settings because of the heightened environmental stresses experienced by urban trees (e.g., higher temperature, lower air humidity, lower soil moisture content) (e.g., 8, 9). Field observations seem to challenge this belief. For example, Gregg et al. (10), using manipulative paired experiments, found that tree seedlings in New York City grew twofold faster than their rural counterparts. Recently, Briber et al. (11) found that the growth rates of trees in remnant forests were mostly accelerated after urbanization in Boston. Imhoff et al. (12) compared the v...