1997
DOI: 10.1038/385059a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conifer root discrimination against soil nitrate and the ecology of forest succession

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

21
314
6
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 451 publications
(343 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
21
314
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from several experiments were pooled (n 16) for calculations of means and SE. These values were used for plotting the representative concentrationdependent curves as well as for calculating V max and K m values according to a method described elsewhere (Kronzucker et al, 1996(Kronzucker et al, , 1997.…”
Section: Influx Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from several experiments were pooled (n 16) for calculations of means and SE. These values were used for plotting the representative concentrationdependent curves as well as for calculating V max and K m values according to a method described elsewhere (Kronzucker et al, 1996(Kronzucker et al, , 1997.…”
Section: Influx Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the effects of N forms are conspicuously different between the males and females, then the variations of the sex ratio and spatial distribution of dioecious plants can be explained accordingly. However, the studies on sex-specific responses to different N forms are scarce (Kronzucker et al 1997;Chen et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that root uptake of NO $ − in particular, but also of NH % + , was low in a stand subjected to high loads of N and that this phenomenon could also be induced by N application to a forest with relatively low N-inputs. Preferential use of NH % + , and inhibition of uptake of NO $ − by NH % + had earlier been shown for conifers (Marschner, Ha$ ussling & George, 1991 ;Flaig & Mohr, 1992 ;Gezelius & Na$ sholm, 1993 ;Kronzucker, Siddiqi & Glass, 1997). It seems clear that trees can decrease N-uptake rates and thereby, at least partly, counteract effects of high loads of N. The mechanism behind such down-regulation of N uptake is not clear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As discussed above, most data indicate that conifers (Kronzucker et al, 1997), as well as many ericaceous species have a preferential uptake of NH % + and are weak competitors for NO $ − . Increased rates of nitrification or increased input of NO $ − through deposition might therefore create a situation where other groups of plants are more competitive, and this might be especially important for understorey plants or for forest trees upon forest regeneration.…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%