Clonal Forestry I 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-84175-0_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conifer Vegetative Propagation: an Overview from a Commercialization Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
6
0
4

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The RGP of the cuttings and transplants was similar in 1996 and 1997 ( [43,47], respectively), but was greater in the transplants in 1997 [45,102]. The transplants had a larger fibrous root system than the cuttings in 1997 (figure 2), perhaps contributing to their higher RGP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RGP of the cuttings and transplants was similar in 1996 and 1997 ( [43,47], respectively), but was greater in the transplants in 1997 [45,102]. The transplants had a larger fibrous root system than the cuttings in 1997 (figure 2), perhaps contributing to their higher RGP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(Irish Forestry Board)). The use of vegetatively propagated material is likely to be an important vehicle for delivering the genetically improved planting stock into use [36,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clonal forestry refers to the largescale deployment of a relatively small number of genotypes that have proven their superiority in clonal trials (Burdon 1989;Libby and Ahuja 1993;Talbert et al 1993;) and is increasingly being adopted for radiata pine in New Zealand with over 12 million radiata pine clonal planting stocks deployed commercially (Sorensson and Shelbourne 2005). Recently, the term "varietal forestry" has been adopted to refer to deployment of genetically tested clones, or varieties, generated through somatic embryogenesis (SE; e.g., Park et al 2006;Sorensson 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) There is no evidence from breeding programs that traits of broad economic importance are controlled by QTL of major effect; large detection-selection populations and many markers are therefore likely to be required for QTL detection and MAS. (5) Clonal propagation, while technically feasible via both embryogenesis and rooted cuttings, is rarely utilized in commercial programs (Talbert et al 1993), limiting the amount of nonadditive genetic variance that can be captured by MAS. Current use of full-sib families can capture one-quarter of the dominance variance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%