1974
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(74)90087-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conjugate convective heat transfer problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (22) will become indeterminate for positive k while for negative k, 1  will converge to a limiting value, this is explained with more details in [4,5,12]. The solution for N1(Z) with respect to  is:…”
Section: Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Equation (22) will become indeterminate for positive k while for negative k, 1  will converge to a limiting value, this is explained with more details in [4,5,12]. The solution for N1(Z) with respect to  is:…”
Section: Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature distribution in a horizontal flat plate of finite thickness was analyzed by Luikov [1] and Payvar [2]. In this conjugate problem the lower surface was maintained at a uniform temperature, while the upper surface was transferring heat to a laminar boundary layer by convection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this particular method the stability is not dependent on the Biot number if the temperature at the interface is updated every iteration, as in the present implementation. The conjugate heat transfer capability of the solver has been previously validated [16] using the analytical solution of Luikov for a flat plate [25] and on a film cooled surface (Martiny et al [26]), not shown in this work.…”
Section: Tab 1 Operative Test Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The velocity profile on the inlet surface is flat. To validate the code a comparison of CFD results to analytical solution of Luikov [13] has been performed. This analytical solution has been chosen because it gives the temperature profile normal to the wall in both fluid and solid field.…”
Section: Flow Field Over a Flat Platementioning
confidence: 99%