2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88378-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Conjugate’ coseismic surface faulting related with the 29 December 2020, Mw 6.4, Petrinja earthquake (Sisak-Moslavina, Croatia)

Abstract: We provide here a first-hand description of the coseismic surface effects caused by the Mw 6.4 Petrinja earthquake that hit central Croatia on 29 December 2020. This was one of the strongest seismic events that occurred in Croatia in the last two centuries. Field surveys in the epicentral area allowed us to observe and map primary coseismic effects, including geometry and kinematics of surface faulting, as well as secondary effects, such as liquefaction, sinkholes and landslides. The resulting dataset consists… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A more detailed analysis, combining InSAR and optical correlation data and a varying secondary fault geometry, will help to better assess its potential reverse component. Nevertheless, this analysis do not support the hypothesis of a NE-SW oriented left-lateral conjugate fault as proposed by Markušić et al (2021) and Tondi et al (2021).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…A more detailed analysis, combining InSAR and optical correlation data and a varying secondary fault geometry, will help to better assess its potential reverse component. Nevertheless, this analysis do not support the hypothesis of a NE-SW oriented left-lateral conjugate fault as proposed by Markušić et al (2021) and Tondi et al (2021).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Reference [14] reports a detailed description of the deformation pattern associated with the Petrinjia earthquake, using both remote sensing (InSAR, Sentinel-1) and field data. Several important coseismic ruptures are observed and mapped in the field [15], testifying to a typical conjugate fault pattern associated with the main NW-SE right lateral seismogenic fault. In [18], a maximum displacement of ~43 cm along the E-W component, a maximum subsidence of −15 cm and an uplift of +19 cm are also reported.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The fault is easily recognized where there is an abrupt transition from westward to eastward deformation (see transcurrent symbol in Figure 5c,d). The short wavelength irregularities of the deformation profiles suggest a mid-rumor for the signal, which, however, does not impede the discernment of a detailed distribution of the displacement, as well as the location of other secondary and conjugate faults in agreement with [15]. Moreover, according to the deduction reported by [15] from field observation, we also detect the presence of an NNW-SSE trending subsided sector (Figure 5d), in agreement with normal faults in a conjugate Riedel shear of strike-slip tectonics.…”
Section: Interferograms Los and Displacement Mapsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations