2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0379-6779(02)01124-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conjugated Block Copolymers for Opto-Electronic Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sun et al have led the way in the design of conjugated BCPs that incorporate bridge units to investigate this issue. [48][49][50][51][52] Specifically, alkyl-and sulfonealkyl-substituted PPVs were utilized as the donor and acceptor moieties, respectively, while a non-conjugated structure served as a flexible bridge between them. Although the results are not compared to a donor/acceptor BCP without the bridge unit, comparisons are provided to simple blends of the donor and acceptor materials.…”
Section: Block Copolymers As Active Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun et al have led the way in the design of conjugated BCPs that incorporate bridge units to investigate this issue. [48][49][50][51][52] Specifically, alkyl-and sulfonealkyl-substituted PPVs were utilized as the donor and acceptor moieties, respectively, while a non-conjugated structure served as a flexible bridge between them. Although the results are not compared to a donor/acceptor BCP without the bridge unit, comparisons are provided to simple blends of the donor and acceptor materials.…”
Section: Block Copolymers As Active Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For polymer samples reported here, the donor block has an average of 30 repeat units, and acceptor has an average 8 repeat units. In comparison to previous -DBAB-type block copolymer samples [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], the acceptor block now uses -SO 2 C 10 H 21 which is much more soluble and processable. For comparison purpose, the D/A blend samples were also prepared with same mole ratio as in the block.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otra desventaja de las células orgánicas fotovoltaicas, que influye a nivel general, es la susceptibilidad que estas presentan frente al oxígeno y el agua [38]. Aun así, la eficiencia de fotoconversión de células solares orgánicas puede verse mejorada considerando factores como la arquitectura de dispositivos, la optimización de estructuras moleculares de polímeros de tipo p, y la optimización de parámetros y condiciones pertenecientes a las capas de deposición en la estructura del dispositivo, lo que logra un incremento del 10% en la eficiencia [39]- [45].…”
Section: Células Orgánicas Fotovoltaicasunclassified