“…However, to the best of our knowledge, applying COFs for C 3 H 4 /C 3 H 6 separation has not been reported yet. Compared with traditional 2D COFs, which usually possess large and noninterconnected pores, 3D COFs tend to possess more complex microporous structures, interconnected channels, and higher structural robustness and have more accessible active sites, which endow them with higher superiority for gas separation. − In recent years, 3D COFs have attracted increasing interest in the construction of novel topologies and functionalities. − ,,− However, hindered by the limited building blocks and difficulty in structure determination, using 3D COFs for efficient gas separation is still in its infancy. ,, Thus, developing 3D COFs with tailored microporous structures and accessible active sites for gas separation, especially C 3 H 4 /C 3 H 6 separation, is of great significance. To achieve such a goal, there are two feasible design approaches: (1) introducing the specific adsorption sites ,, and (2) forming appropriate pore apertures to enhance the interaction of gas molecules and frameworks …”