“…[0,1]. In virtue of[30, Prop 2.4] (see also[31, Prop. 2.14]), as in Lemma 3.2 it suffices to prove the following:if {((y m , z m , w m ), λ m , s m )} ⊂ E ×[λ 0 , λ 0 +1]×[0, 1] is a sequence such that {(T ((y m , z m , w m ), λ m ), g((s m • y m , z m , s m • w m ), λ m ))} ⊂ E × R is bounded, then {(y m , z m , w m )} is bounded in E. We start noticing that T ((y m , z m , w m ), λ m ) 2 = V λ0 y m 2 + | − 1 + 2(λ m − λ 0 )| • z m 2 + w m 2and this immediately implies that {y m } and {w m } are bounded (recall that V λ0 is homogeneous and bounded away from zero on the sphere of radius one).…”