2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connecting Curricular Design and Student Identity Change: An Epistemic Network Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining articles ranged from a single coder to nine coders. The manual coding was supported with software tools in 19 articles (25%), for example, ncoder automatic coding [26], [45], [47], [49], [73], [82], MAXQDA 2018 [84], [90]- [92] and NVivo [67], [104], automated coding algorithm [48], [77], Python [44], and linguistic tools (LIWC and Coh-Metrix) [59].…”
Section: Coding Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The remaining articles ranged from a single coder to nine coders. The manual coding was supported with software tools in 19 articles (25%), for example, ncoder automatic coding [26], [45], [47], [49], [73], [82], MAXQDA 2018 [84], [90]- [92] and NVivo [67], [104], automated coding algorithm [48], [77], Python [44], and linguistic tools (LIWC and Coh-Metrix) [59].…”
Section: Coding Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other reliability tests were used less frequently, such as Krippendorff's test in two articles [97], [98] and Cronbach's alpha in one article [64]. On the other hand, five articles reported only the percentage of agreement between coders [57], [68], [69], [75], [100], and five articles reported that an agreement was tested among coders, without specifying the type of agreement used [79], [84], [90], [91], [101].…”
Section: Coding Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus far, the conversation surrounding debate has labelled it as a feature of more varied discourse. Barany et al [8] analyzed student discussions and included "debate" as a type of interaction, but the authors were not specifically centered on investigating ways in which students formally engage in debate, nor did they explicitly deal with the structure of debate in general. Similarly, Nachtigall and Sung [9] utilize debate as a code to describe student interactions during collaboration, but do not delve into the components of that debate.…”
Section: Introduction 11 Classroom and Online Structured Debatesmentioning
confidence: 99%