2019
DOI: 10.1101/681353
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connecting gene regulatory relationships to neurobiological mechanisms of brain disorders

Abstract: Despite being clinically distinguishable, many neuropsychiatric disorders display a remarked level of genetic correlation and overlapping symptoms. Deciphering neurobiological mechanisms underlying potential shared genetic etiology is challenging because (1) most common risk variants reside in the non-coding region of the genome, and (2) a genome-wide framework is required to compare genome-wide association studies (GWAS) having different power. To address these challenges, we developed a platform, Hi-C couple… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, recent studies of loss-of-function autism spectrum disorder genes, albeit perturbations unlikely to be inherited in combination, also reported convergence, whether evaluated in vitro in human neural progenitor cells 48 and brain organoids 49 , or in vivo in fetal mouse brains 50 and Xenopus tropicalis 51 . Further exploration of cross-disorder convergence of risk is certainly warranted: the common and rare risk variants for SCZ 1,7-12,52-54 , autism spectrum disorder [55][56][57] and more broadly across the neuropsychiatric disorder spectrum [58][59][60][61][62] are all highly enriched for genes involved in synaptic biology and gene regulation. Altogether, while individual CRISPR-mediated genetic perturbation of SCZ eGenes in iGLUTs reveal their causal impacts on gene expression, neurodevelopment, and neuronal activity 32,63-65 , sub-additive and convergent effects suggests a model to explain non-additive interactions and argue for the prioritization of convergent genes as potential therapeutic targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, recent studies of loss-of-function autism spectrum disorder genes, albeit perturbations unlikely to be inherited in combination, also reported convergence, whether evaluated in vitro in human neural progenitor cells 48 and brain organoids 49 , or in vivo in fetal mouse brains 50 and Xenopus tropicalis 51 . Further exploration of cross-disorder convergence of risk is certainly warranted: the common and rare risk variants for SCZ 1,7-12,52-54 , autism spectrum disorder [55][56][57] and more broadly across the neuropsychiatric disorder spectrum [58][59][60][61][62] are all highly enriched for genes involved in synaptic biology and gene regulation. Altogether, while individual CRISPR-mediated genetic perturbation of SCZ eGenes in iGLUTs reveal their causal impacts on gene expression, neurodevelopment, and neuronal activity 32,63-65 , sub-additive and convergent effects suggests a model to explain non-additive interactions and argue for the prioritization of convergent genes as potential therapeutic targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the framework can be modified to include any type of annotation that maps SNPs to genes. For example, recent work to integrate chromatin interaction data from relevant tissues using the MAGMA framework increased power to identify putative risk genes and biological pathways for a range of neuropsychiatric traits [18]. With the availability of tissue-specific multi-omic (transcriptome, chromatin, Hi-C, DNA methylation) datasets through projects such as GTEx…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the common approach of associating SNPs to nearby downstream and upstream genes can elicit false positives [55] and therefore it is necessary to use data from gene eQTLs, epigenetics, and 3D genomics to assess the relationships among regulatory variants and their distal targets. Although most prior variant-to-gene annotation efforts have relied on positional approaches, i.e., assigning SNPs to genes based solely on physical proximity (e.g., MAGMA software [56]), modern approaches in humans rely on extensively curated functional and regulatory mapping from 'omics data (e.g., S-PrediXcan software [57], TWAS [58], Hi-C coupled MAGMA or H-MAGMA software [59]).…”
Section: Multi-species Genomics To Address Challenges In Gwas Variantmentioning
confidence: 99%