Aims: To explore the challenges of engaging men with penile cancer in qualitative interview research.
Background:Qualitative interviewing offers an ideal tool for exploring men's experiences of illness, complementing and providing context to gendered health inequalities identified within epidemiological research on men. But, conducting interview research with men can be challenging and with limited practical, gender sensitive guidance for researchers, embarking on a qualitative interview study with men can feel like a daunting task. Reflecting on a researcher's experience of conducting qualitative research on men with penile cancer, the current paper explores the potential challenges of interviewing this group of men, but also documents how engagement and data collection was achieved.Review methods: This is a reflective paper, informed by the experiences of a male researcher with no nurse training, conducting 27 interviews with men who have been treated for penile cancer. Researcher experience is reported in chronological order, from the methodological challenges of recruitment to those of conducting the interview itself.
Conclusion:Engaging men with penile cancer in a qualitative interview study raises practical, methodological, ethical and emotional challenges for the researcher, however, in reflecting on interviews conducted with men who have received treatment for penile cancer the authors challenge false assumptions that men will not talk about their ill health.Methodological procedures must enable an open and on-going dialogue with clinical 2 gatekeepers and potential participants to promote engagement. Emotional and practical support from colleagues is an essential for any interviewer, no matter how experienced.Implications for practice/research: The paper offers a resource for the novice researcher, highlighting some advantages and disadvantages of conducting qualitative interview research in a nurse researcher role as well as recommendations on how to overcome key challenges.