Connecting resourcefulness and social innovation: exploring conditions and processes in community gardens in the Netherlands

Abstract

Resourcefulness, a community's capacity to engage with their local resource base, is essential in contributing to resilience, the potential to adapt to external challenges and shocks. Resourcefulness and social innovation have some overlapping qualities, however, the academic connection between the two concepts is yet to be explored. Social innovations include new practices, ideas, and initiatives that meet societal needs and contribute to social change and empowerment. Through in-depth interviews and participant observation, this study researches conditions and processes of resourcefulness in facilitating social innovation in rural, peri-urban, and urban community gardens in the North of the Netherlands. Comparing differing contexts, five main enablers for altering social relations and community empowerment have been identified: (1) clear goals and motivations; (2) diversity in garden resources; (3) experimental knowledge processes; (4) strong internal support and recognition; and (5) place-based practices. Above all, this research stresses the importance of defining resourcefulness as a process and foregrounding the place-based contextual nature of innovative collective food system practices.

Ecovillage foodscapes: zooming in and out of sustainable food practices

“…Sustainable food systems emphasize a place-based approach, with shorter physical and mental distances, and the connecting and intertwining of practices around social and environmental care. Employing the foodscapes lens at ecovillages highlights how communities oriented around sustainability utilize their social and spatial resources to craft places that foreground these values, for example being resourceful and integrating food into living environments (Ulug and Horlings 2019). Furthermore, what this paper contributes is evidence of the added value of the interconnected and relational networks for sustainable food system change.…”

Planning for food commons in the post-COVID world

“…In order to help meet community needs in the event of supply-chain interruptions, De Stadsakker has also planned to double its produce yield. The urban garden Toentje produces fresh food for the food bank with the help of volunteers, providing access to affordable food for the urban poor (Ulug and Horlings, 2019). These organisations have thrived as people have gained a new appreciation for supporting local businesses, and many volunteers have stepped up to help make these expansions possible.…”

The social innovation–(re)politicisation nexus: Unlocking the political in actually existing smart city campaigns? The case of SmartCity Cologne, Germany

“…Yet, social innovation remains useful (again with the qualifier of re-politicisation) for framing transformative social change and generating context-specific alternatives to dominant urban development models and approaches (Blanco and León, 2017; Nyseth and Hamdouch, 2019), such as those assumed inevitable in The Smart City . We follow here Ulug and Horlings (2019: 14), who clearly define social innovations as being comprised of, on the one hand, a process (i.e. new rules or organisations of social relations); and on the other hand, a product or end result (i.e.…”