2012
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201200544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connecting Unexplored Protein Crystal Structures to Enzymatic Function

Abstract: Digging in the database: Four synthetically useful transaminases for which no function was known were studied by evaluating a set of eight amino donors and seven acceptors (see figure). The four enzymes differ substantially in their catalytic properties and substrate preferences. We also used the enzymes in the asymmetric synthesis of a range of chiral amines and observed excellent enantioselectivities and conversions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With detailed kinetic analysis and calculations of free energies the same group could show that in the ( S )-transaminase from P. denitrificans differences in kcat/Km values of different substrates arise mainly from their different binding affinity than from the catalytic turnover rate [59]. This binding mode was recently also confirmed by analysing solved structures [26], [29]. Docking of α-methylbenzylamine into the structure of an ω-amino acid:pyruvate aminotransferase (PDB ID: 3A8U) from Pseudomonas putida indicated that several aromatic amino acids (Tyr 23, Phe88*, Tyr152) in the large binding pocket establish a hydrophobic environment enabling the binding of hydrophobic substituents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…With detailed kinetic analysis and calculations of free energies the same group could show that in the ( S )-transaminase from P. denitrificans differences in kcat/Km values of different substrates arise mainly from their different binding affinity than from the catalytic turnover rate [59]. This binding mode was recently also confirmed by analysing solved structures [26], [29]. Docking of α-methylbenzylamine into the structure of an ω-amino acid:pyruvate aminotransferase (PDB ID: 3A8U) from Pseudomonas putida indicated that several aromatic amino acids (Tyr 23, Phe88*, Tyr152) in the large binding pocket establish a hydrophobic environment enabling the binding of hydrophobic substituents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We set out to construct a homology model of OATA to identify key active-site residues responsible for rejecting the entry of bulky substituents in the small pocket. The X-ray structures used as the templates for the homology modeling were -TAs from P. denitrificans (PDB accession number 4GRX; sequence identity, 41%) (35), C. violaceum (PDB accession number 4A6T; sequence identity, 41%) (36), M. loti (PDB accession number 3GJU; sequence identity, 43%) (37), and R. sphaeroides (PDB accession number 3I5T; sequence identity, 34%) (37). The alignment of the OATA sequence with the sequences of the template -TAs is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using four X-ray structures of (S)-selective -TAs as the templates, an homology model of OATA was constructed by use of the Modeler module (version 9.8) of the Discovery Studio package (version 3.5.0; BIOVIA, San Diego, CA). The X-ray structures used as the templates were -TAs from P. denitrificans (PDB accession number 4GRX) (35), Chromobacterium violaceum (PDB accession number 4A6T) (36), Mesorhizobium loti (PDB accession number 3GJU) (37), and Rhodobacter sphaeroides (PDB accession number 3I5T) (37). The outwardpointing arginine of the structure with PDB accession number 4GRX was set to be conserved in the homology model, resulting in a dimeric structure of OATA in which each subunit has a different conformation of the active-site arginine.…”
Section: Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ah omology model of OATA was constructed using the Modeler module (version 9.8). X-ray structures of the four (S)-selective w-TAs from Paracoccus denitrificans (PDB ID:4 GRX), [18] Chromobacteriumv iolaceum (4A6T), [19] Mesorhizobium loti (3GJU) [20] and Rhodobacter sphaeroides (3I5T) [20] were used as templates.T he four w-TAs assumeahomodimeric structure where both active-site arginines form inward conformations (i.e., pointing away from the solvent side), except for 4GRX where one subunit harborsa no utward-pointing active-site arginine.T he outward-pointing arginine of 4GRX was set to be conserved in the homology model, leading to ad imeric structure of OATA where each subunit has ad ifferent conformationofthe active-sitearginine (i.e., an inward-pointing argininei no ne subunit and an outward-pointing argininei n the other subunit). To construct ah oloenzyme structure,t he PLP moiety was copied from 4A6T.S equence alignment for the homology modelingw as carried out using BLOSUM62 as as coring matrix with ad efault setting (À900 gap open penalty; À50 gap extension penalty).…”
Section: Molecular Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%