2013
DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2013.808361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connecting with the user-generated Web: how group identification impacts online information sharing and evaluation

Abstract: Online information pools, such as user-generated encyclopedias and websites that aggregate users' ratings of various products and experiences, are increasingly popular venues where people seek out and share information. While cues about the identity of information sources may be limited in these venues, they may nonetheless incite a sense of shared group membership and social identity among users. This study applies Social Identity Theory and Self-Categorization Theory to examine the effects of group identific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, these findings may suggest that perceived similarity (such as shared interests or traits) between those who are higher in social media self-efficacy could increase trust in the information shared by other social media users. This is consistent with prior research findings that similarity with an information source predicts positive evaluations of information from that source (e.g., Flanagin, Hocevar, & Samahito, 2014;Metzger et al, 2010;Sillence, Briggs, Harris, & Fishwick, 2007). However, additional research is required to test this possibility, as this study did not directly measure perceived similarity between self-efficacious social media users.…”
Section: Trustworthiness Of Online Social Informationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Further, these findings may suggest that perceived similarity (such as shared interests or traits) between those who are higher in social media self-efficacy could increase trust in the information shared by other social media users. This is consistent with prior research findings that similarity with an information source predicts positive evaluations of information from that source (e.g., Flanagin, Hocevar, & Samahito, 2014;Metzger et al, 2010;Sillence, Briggs, Harris, & Fishwick, 2007). However, additional research is required to test this possibility, as this study did not directly measure perceived similarity between self-efficacious social media users.…”
Section: Trustworthiness Of Online Social Informationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In general, our finding are in line with earlier research findings highlighting the importance of online social influence . However, we did not find stronger effects when social influence was coming from similar group members (see ). In the Sample 1, the estimated majority opinion effect was stronger in general if the respondents had been primed with a group membership, but the difference did not reach statistical significance in any of our models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Social media has also become a significant source of peer influence. Conforming to others' behaviours and evaluations is a basic human tendency , and it may be especially salient in the case of computer‐mediated communication and when coming from a group of similar‐minded individuals . The tendency to rely on group norms is dependent on personal characteristics such as self‐esteem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chung and Kim’s [33] seminal work on cancer patients’ and their significant ones’ use of blogs launched multiple studies on the benefits of blogging to patients, HCPs and researchers. Patients who participate in a digital social network benefit in an impressively wide range of ways, including (a) support that contributes to sound decision-making [3338]; (b) better emotion management, connectedness and support, increased problem-solving skills, and opportunities for information sharing [20, 21, 33, 36–42]; (c) taking advantage of the collective wisdom of other bloggers and HCPs [43]; (d) feeling empowered to take more responsibility for participating in clinical, financial and health-related decisions [33]; (e) having an advocacy platform for patients and their families [20, 21, 32, 37, 41], whose influence on policy is extended by media coverage [32, 44]; and (f) the privacy and freedom of anonymous blogging [36, 45, 46] which can facilitate a sense of social identity and belonging [47] while avoiding social stigma [48] and aiding the search for information [49]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%