2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4573(02)00046-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connectionist interaction information retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (Dominich, 2003), the author shows that term co-occurrence is exploited in the connectionist interaction retrieval model, and this can account for or contribute to its effectiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Dominich, 2003), the author shows that term co-occurrence is exploited in the connectionist interaction retrieval model, and this can account for or contribute to its effectiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research should be complemented by the average-case analysis of these (and other) algorithms, coupled with the study of realistic models for the Web graph -an area of research which has seen much activity Pandurangan et al, 2002;Azar et al, 2001;Achlioptas et al, 2001;Kumar et al, 2000;Ruhl et al, 2001). Another issue of importance, under-explored so far in the IR literature, is a methodical analysis of the stability of the running times of the algorithms as their input is perturbed (see, for example, (Dominich and Tuza, 2003)). Stability of running times is especially important in the context of link-analyses on graphs of Web scale, as these algorithms demand considerable computational resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the combination of evidence, there have been several different proposed approaches, based on bayesian networks (Croft and Turtle, 1989;Ribeiro-Neto and Muntz, 1996), or on the propagation of scores across the connections between documents (Dominich, 2002). All these approaches can be used for the combination of evidence, instead of Dempster-Shafer theory.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%