2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2012.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connectivity and thought: The influence of semantic network structure in a neurodynamical model of thinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies, however, have revealed a small-world structure of semantic memory is related to more creative achievements and the facilitation of unique conceptual combinations (Kenett et al, 2016a;Marupaka, Iyer, & Minai, 2012). Moreover, shorter associative pathways have been associated with better performance on divergent thinking tasks (Rossmann & Fink, 2010).…”
Section: Divergent Thinking Divergent Thinking (Dt) Is a Common Proxmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies, however, have revealed a small-world structure of semantic memory is related to more creative achievements and the facilitation of unique conceptual combinations (Kenett et al, 2016a;Marupaka, Iyer, & Minai, 2012). Moreover, shorter associative pathways have been associated with better performance on divergent thinking tasks (Rossmann & Fink, 2010).…”
Section: Divergent Thinking Divergent Thinking (Dt) Is a Common Proxmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Overall, these results complement the network structure of the high openness group, which had shorter paths between concepts and decreased rigidity of categorizations. Thus, people high in openness are more likely to be creative in part because they are better able to access more remote responses for conceptual recombination (Marupaka, Iyer, & Minai, 2012).…”
Section: Unique Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ANSWER model draws upon this work for its theoretical underpinnings. It is based on a neurodynamical model of thinking called IDEA (itinerant dynamics with emergent attractors) that we have described previously [45], [46], [47], [48], and our earlier work on computational models of ideation and priming [49], [50], [51], [52].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elsewhere, we have suggested that these might represent latent ideas that could be the basis of subsequent innovation [53]. In ANSWER, the sampling of ideas from the ASN occurs using the attractor network approach derived from our previously described IDEA model [45], [46], [47], [48]. In that model, the ASN is constructed from the text corpus as a recurrent neural network with neural units representing words and weights encoding associations between them.…”
Section: Description Of Ov Erall Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach is based on a neurodynamical model of thinking that we have described previously [13], [14], [15]. In this model, the epistemic network corresponding to the text corpus is represented as a recurrent neural network with nodes (neural units) representing words and weights encoding associations between them.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%