2010
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2010.091010.101173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connectivity in Selfish, Cooperative Networks

Abstract: Abstract-This paper studies the connectivity of large cooperative ad hoc networks. Unlike existing work where all nodes are assumed to transmit cooperatively, the cooperative network we consider is realistic as we assume that not all nodes are willing to collaborate when relaying other nodes' traffic. For such selfish, cooperative network, we use stochastic geometry and percolation theory to analyze the connectivity and provide an upper bound of critical node density when the network percolates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi-way relay communications were studied for a group of single-antenna users with regenerative relaying strategies in [7]. By using stochastic geometry and percolation theory, the authors analyzed the connectivity of cooperative ad hoc network with selfishness in [18]. Using non-coherent fast frequency hopping (FFH) techniques, information exchange among a group of users was studied in [9] where information exchange could be accomplished within only two time slots regardless of the number of users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-way relay communications were studied for a group of single-antenna users with regenerative relaying strategies in [7]. By using stochastic geometry and percolation theory, the authors analyzed the connectivity of cooperative ad hoc network with selfishness in [18]. Using non-coherent fast frequency hopping (FFH) techniques, information exchange among a group of users was studied in [9] where information exchange could be accomplished within only two time slots regardless of the number of users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From [4], we know that the network capacity is decreased with increasing transmission radius, since the number of simultaneous transmissions is decreased. We can enhance the transmission power to offset the impact of node density, which also provides sufficient conditions to guarantee the connectivity of the network [20]. In addition, we also give a comparison with previous works in Figure 5b.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this work, we study the throughput of wireless ad hoc networks with selfish nodes under general node density. We denote these networks as SWANETs, which were widely researched in connectivity [20] and routing protocol [21]. Minho Jo [22] et al proposed an easy and efficient cooperative of neighboring (COOPON) technique to detect the selfish cognitive radio attack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in both BA and DS, the preferential attachment for a node applies to all the other nodes in the network. Actually, nodes prefer or have to connect with their local neighbors in many real networks [16]. Taking these into account, this paper proposes NLL model.…”
Section: Neighborhood Log-on and Log-off Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%