2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connectivity inference from neural recording data: Challenges, mathematical bases and research directions

Abstract: This article presents a review of computational methods for connectivity inference from neural activity data derived from multi-electrode recordings or fluorescence imaging. We first identify biophysical and technical challenges in connectivity inference along the data processing pipeline. We then review connectivity inference methods based on two major mathematical foundations, namely, descriptive model-free approaches and generative model-based approaches. We investigate representative studies in both catego… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One common approach to obtain information from in vitro neuronal networks is to record their activity via multi-electrode array (MEA) or calcium fluorescence imaging and then use network activity features to describe their physiology. One main limitation, however, is that these highdimensional data, which report about the information representation in the network, do not translate into a clear understanding of how this representation was produced and how it emerged based on neuronal connectivity [25]. The synchronization of spontaneous spike trains among different MEA sites or neurons, also referred to as network bursting, is an example of observed neural behaviors widely reported in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One common approach to obtain information from in vitro neuronal networks is to record their activity via multi-electrode array (MEA) or calcium fluorescence imaging and then use network activity features to describe their physiology. One main limitation, however, is that these highdimensional data, which report about the information representation in the network, do not translate into a clear understanding of how this representation was produced and how it emerged based on neuronal connectivity [25]. The synchronization of spontaneous spike trains among different MEA sites or neurons, also referred to as network bursting, is an example of observed neural behaviors widely reported in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only model-based approaches [25,28] have been proposed for inference of effective connectivity. Among them, dynamic causal modeling (DCM) [29] and structural equation modeling [30] variants have shown best performances ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations