2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2018.8422587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connectivity Times for Mobile D2D Networks

Abstract: Connectivity questions for mobile D2D networks are often approached by considering steady state performance metrics. This is due to the difficulty in handling a finite time horizon with random mobility. Hence, in this paper we create a framework to evaluate connectivity time in closed form over a finite time horizon for mobile devices. The basic metric is the mean proportion of time devices are connected over a finite period. The methodology is shown to deliver closed form results for a variety of deterministi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best known special case is the two-dimensional OU process where v(x) = αx for some positive constant, α. In this case, the processes, X 1 (t), X 2 (t) R(t) are well known, see for example [26, p.234] and [29], and extensive transient as well as steady state results are available since, in this case, X 1 (t), X 2 (t) are Gaussian. In most other cases the transient solution is not available but steady state results on the displacement PDF, connectivity probability, MFHT and kinetic energy are given in Secs.…”
Section: Special Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best known special case is the two-dimensional OU process where v(x) = αx for some positive constant, α. In this case, the processes, X 1 (t), X 2 (t) R(t) are well known, see for example [26, p.234] and [29], and extensive transient as well as steady state results are available since, in this case, X 1 (t), X 2 (t) are Gaussian. In most other cases the transient solution is not available but steady state results on the displacement PDF, connectivity probability, MFHT and kinetic energy are given in Secs.…”
Section: Special Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) Hence, using the recursion in (29), I m can be solved in terms of I 0 which is given in [30,Eq. 3.322.1].…”
Section: A Ramp Control (Rc) and On-off Control (Oc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof: To obtain the pdf, apply the principle of random variable transformation to (7) and the result follows. The cdf, instead, is obtained by integrating the pdf in (15).…”
Section: Corollary 3 the Density Function Of The Link Snr Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link performance is fundamentally determined by the instantaneous SNR and, hence, it has been extensively analyzed in the literature. Authors in [7] used the link SNR to evaluate the mean proportion of time that two mobile devices are connected for five different types of mobility (including Ornstein-Uhlenbeck mobility). In [8], the authors characterized variations in the SNR process to study the coverage and outage durations experienced by mobile users, while, in [9] they studied the time variations of the SNR in the absence of fading experienced when a mobile user moves across a Poisson cellular network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these synthetic models, while allowing analysis, possesses undesirable features, such as piecewise motion for waypoint models and unbounded wandering in Brownian motion. Critically, they lack the ability to explicitly model the control mechanism which attempts to return the node to the desired location [9]. Hence, in this paper, we are motivated to create a family of 3D mobility models based on stochastic differential equations (SDEs) which explicitly allow the use of different control mechanisms and lead to tractable steady state solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%