2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connectome spectral analysis to track EEG task dynamics on a subsecond scale

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
5
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the graph domain, it was shown that harmonic modes of the structural connectome can explain functional connectivity, in particular, resting state networks (Atasoy et al, 2016). More generally, harmonic modes of the structural connectome are useful for our understanding of how functional activity is variably shaped by underlying white matter connectivity (Preti and Van De Ville, 2019;Glomb et al, 2020). Moreover, harmonic modes of the structural connectivity have been found to predict disease progression in dementia (Raj et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the graph domain, it was shown that harmonic modes of the structural connectome can explain functional connectivity, in particular, resting state networks (Atasoy et al, 2016). More generally, harmonic modes of the structural connectome are useful for our understanding of how functional activity is variably shaped by underlying white matter connectivity (Preti and Van De Ville, 2019;Glomb et al, 2020). Moreover, harmonic modes of the structural connectivity have been found to predict disease progression in dementia (Raj et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link between structural and functional connectivity is made by dynamical models, which suggest that space and time are linked via the oscillatory frequencies of certain brain networks (Atasoy et al, 2018). Further evidence for a link between spatial patterns and oscillations comes from applications of harmonic modes of the structural connectivity to faster timescales (i.e., M/EEG) (Glomb et al, 2020;Tokariev et al, 2019;Raj et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, MRI data is employed to obtain local graph edges based on the surface mesh; DTI data is employed to add long-range white-matter connections to the graph. The main difference with previous studies analyzing brain activity in terms of the anatomical connectome graph Laplacian [11] is that instead of constructing the combinatorial (binary) graph Laplacian, here we construct a distance-weighted graph Laplacian (Eqs (19)(20)(21)(22)). This allows us to take into account physical distance properties of the cortex that are relevant for graph neural fields, and that are otherwise lost.…”
Section: Author Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore in [11], for the first time to the best of our knowledge, a model of neural activity making use of the graph Laplacian was implemented, and used to suggest the role of Excitatory-Inhibitory dynamics as possible underlying mechanism for the self-organization of resting-state activity patterns. In other very recent work [19,20] techniques based on the graph Laplacian were employed to model EEG and MEG oscillations. Considering these developments, the combination of neural activity modelling and graph signal processing techniques appears as a promising direction for further inquiry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdelnour et al report that only the first few Laplacian eigenmodes (with smallest eigenvalues) are required to resemble empirical functional connectivity of resting state BOLD fMRI [5,41]; similar results were reported by Atasoy and others [42][43][44]. Other studies involve a series expansion of the graph adjacency or Laplacian matrices [45][46][47][48][49], which also amount to weighting the first natural eigenvectors more heavily in the summation. This discrepancy might reflect the different context here: MEG rather than fMRI, and modeling of spectral power instead of functional connectivity.…”
Section: No Natural Ordering Of Eigenmodesmentioning
confidence: 66%