1980
DOI: 10.1080/03115518008558981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conodont assemblages from the Cobar Supergroup (Early Devonian), New South Wales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is only tentatively placed in synonymy here because it has a more pronounced postero-basal extension than our specimens. The element illustrated by Pickett (1980, fig. 15Q) is tentatively included in the synonymy for the same reasons.…”
Section: Panderodus Unicostatus (Branson and Mehl 1933)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is only tentatively placed in synonymy here because it has a more pronounced postero-basal extension than our specimens. The element illustrated by Pickett (1980, fig. 15Q) is tentatively included in the synonymy for the same reasons.…”
Section: Panderodus Unicostatus (Branson and Mehl 1933)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The White Tank Limestone Member was described by Felton (1981) as consisting of massively bedded, autochthonous coralline and stomatoporoidal limestones interpreted as a forereef facies grading laterally into well-bedded calcarenites and calcirudites of the Rookery Limestone Member -interpreted as backreef facies. Because the conodonts of these two units have been documented (Pickett 1980), our consideration of them has been limited to a cursory examination of the outcrops, reappraisal of the taxonomy of the forms illustrated by Pickett (1980) and reconsideration of their age-significance.…”
Section: White Tank and Rookery Limestone Members Of The Meryula Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations