2016
DOI: 10.1086/685712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consanguineous Marriage, Kinship Ecology, and Market Transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Humans learn the rules of cultural institutions while individual agents push the limits, bringing about game changes that alter niches and make history. ( [24], and see [23,25,[33][34][35][36][37][38] for detailed examples of these patterns/processes) Any attempt to include the range of active processes involved in the production, maintenance and patterns that characterize the variables in the human niche must be able to accommodate, accurately, the diversity of human developmental, physiological, behavioural, perceptual and cultural action. This is not to say that standard evolutionary approaches are incorrect, rather that they are incomplete.…”
Section: The Standard Evolutionary Approach and The Problem Of Human Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humans learn the rules of cultural institutions while individual agents push the limits, bringing about game changes that alter niches and make history. ( [24], and see [23,25,[33][34][35][36][37][38] for detailed examples of these patterns/processes) Any attempt to include the range of active processes involved in the production, maintenance and patterns that characterize the variables in the human niche must be able to accommodate, accurately, the diversity of human developmental, physiological, behavioural, perceptual and cultural action. This is not to say that standard evolutionary approaches are incorrect, rather that they are incomplete.…”
Section: The Standard Evolutionary Approach and The Problem Of Human Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over a billion of the global population live in communities where CM is a traditional and respected social trend of marital union [3,4]. The primary reasons for a preference for CM in communities with high consanguinity rates include maintaining the lineage solidarity of family, relative ease for the partners in finding a suitable spouse, backing the female status and improved relationships with in-laws, lowering the marital cost, enhancing the likelihood of getting better care for people in old age, and above all, better stability of marital relationship [1,2,[5][6][7][8][9]. These factors seem to carry more significance in the context of protective and semi-protective cultures of many Middle Eastern, South and West Asian, and sub-Saharan African societies, which is why CM is most frequent in these countries [4,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions are generally cooperative but may also be competitive, especially in the context of poverty or resource stress (e.g. [51]).…”
Section: Sample and Methods (A) Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%