1988
DOI: 10.1080/19485565.1988.9988710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consanguineous marriages in Beirut: Time trends, spatial distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the assumption that 25% of marriages occur between first cousins, F was found to be equal to 1.56%. [22][23][24] Under the same assumption, the ROH method and FEstim estimated F equal to 2.3 and 2.6%, respectively; these values are significantly higher than what was previously found (1.56%). Therefore, these genome-wide findings lead to the inclusion of Lebanon in the group of Middle Eastern countries that show high levels of inbreeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the assumption that 25% of marriages occur between first cousins, F was found to be equal to 1.56%. [22][23][24] Under the same assumption, the ROH method and FEstim estimated F equal to 2.3 and 2.6%, respectively; these values are significantly higher than what was previously found (1.56%). Therefore, these genome-wide findings lead to the inclusion of Lebanon in the group of Middle Eastern countries that show high levels of inbreeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Under the assumption that 25% of the unions in Lebanon are between first cousins, HBD values (Table 1) lead to an estimated F mean value equal to 2.3%, a much higher percentage than the previously estimated (1.56%). 3,[23][24][25] Homozygosity estimation using FEstim Among the 90 individuals, 48 had an inbreeding coefficient F significantly different than zero (Figure 2). In fact, we found that 33 of 34 FCO individuals and 14 of 55 (25%) URO individuals were inbred.…”
Section: Distribution Of Roh Regions Between Lebanese Communities Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the hus band's education and his parents' consan guinity status were found to be significant variables. In other studies [11,[32][33][34][35], people in the lower social strata were more likely to practise endogamy than those in the upper strata of society, an example being the Pakis tanis in Britain who are associated with poor health indicators [36], but practise endogamy even at higher rates than those in Pakistan. However, in another study [29] from Bir mingham, social class and demographic fea tures were not found to contribute to the inci dence of consanguinity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Consanguinity has a significant influence on child mortality and morbidity independent of other causes of death and disease. '3'14 Previous studies of mainly nonconsanguineous parents have found that once stillbirth or infant death has appeared in a family, the risk of recurrence in subsequent siblings is higher than the population risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%